Designer babies are the power outcome of embryo editing technology in which the parents have their own choice from Catalogue to select their unborn with desirable traits such as High IQ ,Height, fair complexion etc., as quoted in the nursery poem ”chubby cheeks, Dimple chin” as well genetic disorder free. (Designer babies: Creating the perfect child - CNN.com)
A great number of Parents (75%) are in favor of selecting their child’s genetic material free for any types of imperfections such as predisposition to cancer, Alzheimer’s, Muscular dystrophy, Progeria etc.,
Currently, we are able to determine the sex of the embryo, PGD quite helpful to determine any sex-link disorders such as color blindness, hemophilia, etc.
Parents go for Genetic screening -- whereby embryos are selected for sex and checked for certain disease-bearing genes. If any faulty gene is found they are advised to terminate pregnancy or In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) if analyzed at a pre-implantation stage pregnancy is continued with disease free child. (Designer babies: Creating the perfect child - CNN.com)
Doctors can screen for over 100 different conditions, including many that severely cut down the quality and length of life, such as Tay-Sachs disease, which usually kills children by the age of four, and Huntington’s, hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, and sickle cell disease. In addition the chromosomal disorders such as Down’s syndrome, Cry-do-chat syndrome also screened. (http://www.medicaldaily.com/designer-babies-preimplantation-genetic-diagnosis-fact-fiction-379387)
In a recent U.S survey of researchers conducted by the New York University School of Medicine. Out of 999 people who sought genetic counseling, a majority said they supported prenatal genetic tests for the elimination of certain serious diseases. The survey found that 56% supported using them to counter blindness and 75% for mental retardation.
More provocatively, about 10% of supported they would want genetic testing for athletic ability, while another 10% voted for improved height. Nearly 13% backed the approach to select for superior intelligence. (http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/health/Make-Way-for-Designer-Babies.html)
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, or PGD .has long been used for the medical purpose of averting life-threatening diseases in children, the science behind it has quietly progressed to the point to create designer babies.But the growth of PGD in Fertility Institutes in U.S., has accelerated genetic knowledge swiftly enough for pre-selecting cosmetic traits in a baby. (http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB123439771603075099)
What is a genetic disorder?
A genetic disorder is a disease that is caused by a change, or mutation, in an individual’s DNA sequence.
A genetic disorder is an illness caused by changes in a person’s DNA.
These mutations can be due to an error in DNA replication or due to environmental factors, such as cigarette smoke and exposure to radiation, which cause changes in the DNA sequence.
The human genome is a complex set of instructions, like a recipe book, directing our growth and development.
However, unlike a printed book, the human genome can change.
These changes can affect the individual bases (A, C, G or T) or much larger chunks of DNA or even chromosomes.
Our DNA provides the code for making proteins, the molecules that perform most of the functions in our body.
However, when a section of our DNA is changed in some way, the protein it codes for is also affected and may no longer be able to carry out its normal function.
Depending on where these mutations occur, they can have little or no effect, or may profoundly alter the biology of cells in our body, resulting in a genetic disorder.( http://www.yourgenome.org/facts/what-is-a-genetic-disorder)
Is it \'unethical\' to correct genetic errors to prevent genetic disorders?
The genome editing occurs as the cell rushes to naturally repair the break made by the scissors. The cell’s repair often isn’t exact enough for the gene that has been cut to keep working and the gene is effectively knocked out or turned off. More complex to accomplish, though more precise, genes can also be corrected or whole new genes added if a new piece of DNA is included along with the Crispr machinery. It becomes patched in during the cellular repair process.
Different repair pathway that sometimes repairs the cut according to a DNA template. If researchers provide the template, they can edit the genome with nearly any sequence they desire at nearly any site of their choosing. (http://www.nature.com/news/crispr-gene-editing-is-just-the-beginning-1.19510)
CRISPR-Cas9 has recently emerged as a powerful and universal technology for gene editing with wide-ranging implications across biology and medicine.
CRISPR/Cas9, a tool used to \"edit\" the human genome with incredible precision, these questions are no longer theoretical and philosophical — they are very, very real.
Just three years after its initial development, CRISPR technology is already widely used by biologists as a kind of search-and-replace tool to alter DNA, even down to the level of a single letter.
Crispr can be thought of as a pair of molecular scissors guided by a satnav. The scissors are a DNA-cutting enzyme; they snip at a precise point in the cell’s DNA specified by researchers using a customised guide molecule, a single short piece of RNA, DNA’s chemical cousin. The DNA-cutting enzyme is known as Cas9, hence the technique is often written Crispr-Cas9.
Somatic cell editing is a sort of upgrade to an earlier technique for curing single gene disorders known as gene therapy. Gene therapy introduces a whole new working copy of a gene, which randomly incorporates into the genome to do the job of the faulty one. Genome editing is different in that it precisely targets the existing faulty gene for knock-out or correction. That means the gene’s setting doesn’t change, so doctors neither have to worry that it will incorporate somewhere that causes other genes to be inadvertently turned on, nor that the gene won’t work as normal, for example by not producing the right amount of protein.
One challenge shared by Crispr and gene therapy is how to get the gene – or Crispr machinery – inside cells. Methods being adopted from gene therapy to encapsulate and deliver it range from modified viruses to nanoparticles. All are still far from perfect. “People are working hard on delivery.
Delivery is made easier, however, when the cells can be removed for editing. Once outside the body they can be purified, expanded in culture, and checked via genome sequencing to ensure the editing has been successful. That means the early clinical impact of Crispr is likely to be in treating genetic diseases arising in blood cells such as sickle cell anaemia, SCID and beta thalassemia. Doctors are adept at extracting blood and bone marrow (rich in blood stem cells, which give rise to all other blood cells), isolating particular cells for manipulation, and then re-implanting them. Diseases where the cells can’t be removed for treatment will require more work. That includes haemophilia, muscular dystrophy, and cystic fibrosis, which predominantly arise in the liver, muscle and lung cells respectively.
Genome-editing technologies may offer a powerful approach to treat many human diseases, including HIV/AIDS, haemophilia, sickle-cell anemia and cancer.
(Carroll, D. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 409–439 (2014)).
By editing the DNA of these cells or the embryo itself (germline engineering), it could be possible to correct disease genes and pass those genetic fixes on to future generations. ( http://explorebiotech.com/did-you-know-that-you-can-actually-design-a-baby-just-the-way-you-desire/)
The technology functions as molecular scissors to perform precise surgery on genes and various versions of the system have been developed to broaden its range of applications to manipulate genes and their expression in a large variety of cells and organisms. ( https://singularityhub.com/2016/10/03/designer-babies-and-the-new-technology-of-having-children)
Crispr on somatic cells is far more complex: humans have trillions of cells and many different cell types. The genome-tinkering machinery has to be delivered to a sufficient proportion of the specific problem cells to bring about a therapeutic effect.
That alone is a boon to scientists who want to disrupt a gene to learn about what it does. (https://www.technologyreview.com/s/535661/engineering-the-perfect-baby/).
Baby safety is paramount among the arguments against modifying the human germ line (egg and sperm cells). If a mosaic embryo is created, the embryo’s germ line may or may not carry the genetic alteration. But the use of CRISPR/Cas9 in human embryos certainly makes onward human germ line modification a possibility.
This history-making medical advance could be as important to this century as vaccines were to the last.
The prospect of modifying human embryos is deeply controversial because the DNA changes, and any unintended potentially harmful effects, would be passed on from generation to generation. The risks of altering the human germ line, as it is called, has troubled ethicists for decades. Without proper regulation, the procedure also raises the spectre of “designer babies”, where embryos are genetically modified to enhance them in the eyes of their parents.
Pros and Cons of Designer Babies
Reduces risk of genetic diseases
Reduces risk of inherited medical conditions
Keep pace with others doing it
Better chance the child will succeed in life
Better understanding of genetics
Increased life span
Can give a child genes that the parents do not carry
Prevent next generation of family from getting characteristics/diseases
Termination of embryos
Could create a gap in society
Possibility of damage to the gene pool
Baby has no choice in the matter
Genes often have more than one use
Geneticists are not perfect
Loss of Individuality
Other children in family could be affected by parent\'s decision
Only the rich can afford it
Exponential technologies in the next 20 years are going to play a huge role in the way in which we decided to bring life into this world.
Here are three amazing new approaches that may represent the future of reproduction:
1. Making Babies With More Than Two People: This April, the world’s first baby was born from a new procedure that combines the DNA of three people. Nuclear DNA came from a mother and a father, and mitochondrial DNA was transferred into the fertilized egg from a third donor.
2. Making Babies Without Eggs: Scientists out of the University of Bath say early experiments suggest it may one day be possible to make babies without using eggs. They have succeeded in creating healthy baby mice by tricking sperm into believing they were fertilizing normal eggs. In this scenario, two men could have a child, with one donating an ordinary cell and the other donating sperm. Or one man could have his own child using his own cells and sperm, with that child being more like a non-identical twin than a clone.
3. Artificial Wombs: In the mid-1990s, Japanese investigators succeeded in maintaining goat fetuses for weeks in a machine containing artificial amniotic fluid. Today, it is possible for a preterm fetus to survive when removed from the mother at a gestational age of slightly less than 22 weeks. That’s only a little more than halfway through the pregnancy (normally 40 weeks). Moms imagine not having to carry a baby around for nine months at a time. ( https://singularityhub.com/2016/10/03/designer-babies-and-the-new-technology-of-having-children/)
Now Humanity is moving from evolution by natural selection (Darwinism) to evolution by intelligent direction at an accelerating pace.
Many countries do not have explicit legislation in place permitting or forbidding genetic engineering in humans — considering such research experimental and not therapeutic (see go.nature.com/uvthmu). However, in nations with policies regarding inheritable genetic modification, it has been prohibited by law or by measures having the force of law. (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/regulate-designer-babies/Future )
Research involving genetic modification of human germ cells should take place. Such discussions must include the public as well as experts and academics Involving scientists, bioethicists, regulators and the general public.
Key to all discussion and future research is making a clear distinction between genome editing in somatic cells and in germ cells. A voluntary restrictive legislation to be made in the scientific community could be an effective way to discourage human germline modification and raise public awareness of the difference between these two techniques.
Embryos lacks ethical concern over medical necessary in genetic disorder to intervene to save life. DNA editing offer the precise modification of faulty gene in rare life threatening genetic disorders like Cystic fibrosis, Bubble boy syndrome, Inborn errors, SCIDS, Cancer now practically possible. Defective gene is restored by somatic gene therapy provides temporary solution by tailored viruses. Cruise missile CRISPR /Cas9 technology is precise to replace defective gene. Embryo editing provides Parent choice for either terrible gene disorder free child or designer baby with smarter personality with More IQ, fair complexion, more athletic ability, greater talent for music etc., Such non-therapeutic genetic enhancement should not violate human ethics.
Philosophically or ethically justifiable applications for this technology — should any ever exist — are moot until it becomes possible to demonstrate safe outcomes and obtain reproducible data over multiple generations.
...(download the rest of the essay above)