Essay: Impact of structure culture on human resource practices

Essay details:

  • Subject area(s): Business essays
  • Reading time: 16 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published on: August 2, 2018
  • File format: Text
  • Number of pages: 2
  • Impact of structure culture on human resource practices
    0.0 rating based on 12,345 ratings
    Overall rating: 0 out of 5 based on 0 reviews.

Text preview of this essay:

This page of the essay has 4534 words. Download the full version above.

The success Associate in Nursingd growth of a company depends on however effectively and with efficiency will it worker performs and culture could be a means that through that workers learn and communicate what’s acceptable or unacceptable in an organisation within the lightweight of its values and norms. This paper seeks to explore relationship between organization culture and job performance. it absolutely was hypothesized that impact of structure cultural issue doesn’t take issue considerably across the organization outcome as perceived by the workers operating within the organization research worker tries to develop the structure culture variable construct that affects the workers for enhancing work motivation and his performance. 229 respondents working with completely different producing, commercialism and repair organization within the district were surveyed. There was proof to counsel that there’s vital distinction within the mean of different structure cultural issue across the structure outcome as perceived by the workers. thus acceptable structure cultural variable ought to be promoted within the organization to reinforce the employee’s productivity and successively up structure performance.
This paper shows results of the impact of structure culture on human resource practices in some chosen Nigerian personal universities. The applied mathematics analysis was supported 2 hundred and 37 respondents within the chosen studied personal universities showing that an in depth relationship exists between structure culture and achievement method, coaching programs, job performance management, performance of workers, pay structure, and compensation administration. The paper prompt that given the structure context of the study, every of the variables are going to be appreciated additional by the people in values, beliefs, and practices of the organization. it’s thus instructed that prospective workers or job seekers ought to endeavor to acquaint themselves with the structure culture before acceptive job offers.


Employees are the basic building blocks of an organisation. The success and growth of an organisation depends on how effectively and efficiently does it employee performs and culture is a means through which employees learn and communicate what is acceptable or unacceptable in an organisation in the light of it values and norms. Organization culture is the set of assumptions, beliefs, values and norms that are shared by an organisation member.

Organisation culture being unique and distinctive prescribes some specific modes of behaviour for its employees. It sets a framework within which individual and group behaviour takes place. The match between employees and the organization is very important as there is greater likelihood that they will demonstrate commitment to organizational goals. Motivation is the complex force starting and keeping a person at work in an organisation. Performance is the extent to which an individual is carrying out assignment or task. Job performance is the net effect of an employee’s effort as modified by abilities and roles or task perceptions. The research paper aims to study the impact of organization culture on employee motivation and job performance in Dehradun region of Uttarakhand state. The present study focus on assessing organization culture and its impact by studying the demographic profile of respondents as well as their perception of various organizational culture variables in their organization.

Organizational development has some particular features that can increase sustainability on basis of effectiveness. The enhancement in performance contributes to employee commitment while norms, values and objectives contribute in enhancing the culture of an organization (Awadh & Saad, 2013). Most of us contribute a great part of their time in organizations. The study of Geert Hofstede indicates that cultural differences among nations are found specifically on the greatest level; that is on the level of values. By comparing cultural differences between organizations are specifically identified on the basis of practices. In comparison with values, practices are more tangible. “Organizational Culture can be defined as “the collective programming of the mind that distinguishes the members of one organization from others”. (Hofstede, The Hofstede Center). Hofstede (1980) searches for distinctions among 160 000 IBM employees in 50 various countries moreover in three regions of the world, in order to search different elements of culture that can affect the organizational behavior. He provides reasons for cultural differences that may exist in different regions, as well as the significance of international awareness and multiculturalism for the individual cultural introspection. Cultural differences reveal distinctions in thinking and social action, and even in “mental programs”, some sort of term Hofstede uses for expected behaviour. Hofstede correlates culture to ethnic as well as regional groups, but additionally to organizations, profession, family, to community as well as subcultural groups, political systems and legal guidelines, This specific research acknowledged systematic variations in national culture with four dimensions: power distance (PDI), individualism (IDV), uncertainty avoidance (UAI) and masculinity (MAS) (Hofstede,

In 1998 Hofstede and Bond determined 5th dimension in which short and long term orientations of 23 countries are identified. organizational behaviour which is related to practitioner’s values and beliefs is based on culture elements and norms that influence personality and performance of organization. (Sondergaard, 1994) The cultural elements and personality effects behaviour and sustainability of organization (Schwartz, 1994) the strong relationship of culture has been identified in the model produced by Hofstede in 1980 which represents the 38 countries research. Organizational performance is comprised of the actual output or results of an organization as measured against its intended outputs (or goals and objectives). One of the most important reasons that explain the interest in organizational culture is the assumption that certain organizational cultures lead to an increase in organizational performance. (Ilies & Gavrea). Organizational performance comprises the actual productions as well as outcomes or outcomes of an organization which are measured against its expected outcomes. According to (Kaplan & Norton, 1992) no single measure can provide a clear performance target….so managers have to choose between financial and operational measures. In this study Items from (Kaplan & Norton, 1992)balance score card are used to measure the organizational performance. These dimensions of the Balance Score card include 1. financial perspective; 2. customer perspective; 3. internal business perspective 4. Learning Perspective. Organizational Culture is the most important variable that influences the organizational performance. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of organizational culture on organizational performance in different franchises of Bahawalpur based Telecom Companies. This finding can be useful to telecom companies and their managers when attempting to understand the influence of organizational culture on organizational performance.

Hiring the incorrect person for the work are often pricey. The time and expenses related to advertising, agency fees, interviewing candidates and therefore the negative future financial and non-financial implications of hiring the incorrect person create finding and hiring the proper person crucial. historically, organizations have focused on characteristic and choosing individuals supported their skills and knowledge. It is sensible if one will notice one who has the proper set of skills and has done an analogous job. there’s a decent likelihood that they’re going to be able to perform effectively in a very new role. tho’ skills and knowledge still be vital, observe but pointed to psychological feature work as a key human within the choice method. Chartman, (2001) defines psychological feature slot in 2 distinct ways in which, i.e. job work motivation and organization work motivation.

Job work motivation is that the degree to that the activities ANd responsibilities of a selected job ar per the activities and responsibilities that a personal finds in person satisfying whereas organization work motivation is that the individual’s compatibility with an organization’s values and mode of operation. structure work covers a variety of organizational attributes that is that the commonest and often cited component that centers on the harmoniousness between individual and structure values. it’s conjointly referred to as ‘culture fit’. whereas these 2 constructs play vital roles in creating effective hiring choices, Cable and choose, (1996) believe structure work progressively represents the key. Most times, organizations fail to think about psychological feature work and particularly structure work. However, as a results of increasing quality, modification and worker demands, data concerning structure work will facilitate organizations create higher hiring choic

Numerous analysis results illustrate the importance of the harmoniousness between the values of the individual and therefore the values and culture of the organization. The importance of recruiting for culture work can’t be overemphasized attributable to its impact on creating sensible achievement choices is supported by the impact of poor culture work choices. It helps to scale back absence and turnover. Also, assessing for work helps the organizations increase worker satisfaction and morale, that results in higher performance and productivity. motivated staff ar a lot of possible to require charge of their own performance, look for ways in which to enhance processes, merchandise and services and contribute absolutely to their organization’s bottom line success.

Because job discontent is that the leading reason behind voluntary turnover and is directly joined to lower productivity and morale, it is sensible to think about and assess for work throughout the achievement method. Thus, the importance of values and values integration throughout the achievement method is close.

In the organizations Culture are often learned and shared (Titiev, 1959). in keeping with (Pettigrew, 1979)cultures of a corporation relies on the systems which will facilitate to outline however staff take call and assume. He conjointly noted the various level of culture supported the many-sided set of beliefs, values and assumptions might outline ways in which to organizations to try to to its business. structure culture is that the combination of values, beliefs, and norms which can impact the method staff behave, assume and feel within the organization (Schein, 2011).

There ar four functions of organization culture: providing sense of identity to members, enhancing the commitment, strengthening structure values, and shaping behavior through a bearing mechanism (Nelson , 2011). Performance may be a live that involves productivity, quality, consistency, and so on. On the opposite facet, performance indicators involve results and behaviors (criterion-based) and education and coaching ideas and instruments involving management development and leadership coaching for developing necessities skills and attitudes of performance management, relative (normative) measures (Richard, 2002).

The organization’s performance is that the operate of the fundamental returns to the Instillation of sturdy culture within the organization’s systems that change it to perform its routines beyond question. this idea is vital in allowing researchers and managers to asses firms’ performance over time and matches their performance with the competitors. In straightforward word, structure performance is that the most essential criterion in managing and assessing the actions and environments of organizations. 


Organizational culture is conceptualized as shared beliefs and values among the organization that helps to form the behavior patterns of staff (Kotter and Heskett, 1992). Gordon and Cummins (1989) outline organization culture because the drive that acknowledges the efforts and contributions of the structure members and provides comparative understanding of what and the way to be achieved, however goals ar reticular, and the way every worker might attain goals. Hofstede (1990) summarizes organization culture as collective method of the mind that differentiates the members of 1 cluster from the opposite one. Thus, we are able to deduce from on top of definitions that structure culture can be the means that of keeping workers in line and acclimatizing them towards structure objectives. Deal and Kennedy, (1982) acknowledges the link between culture and structure wonderful performances via its human resource development programmes. These cultural values and human resource development programmes ar in line with structure chosen ways that crystal rectifier to self-made organizations. The structure culture is made public in Schein (1990) as overall development of the organization like natural settings, the ceremony and rituals, climate, values and programmes of the corporate e.g. performance management, coaching and development, achievement and choice, etc. in step with Martins and Terblanche (2003), culture is deeply related to values and beliefs shared by personnel in a corporation. structure culture relates the staff to Organization’s values, norms, stories, beliefs and principles and incorporates these assumptions into them as activity and activity set of standards. Klein, (1996) positioned structure culture because the core of organization’s activities that has mixture impact on its overall effectiveness and also the quality of its product and services. Schein (2004) outlined structure culture as a dynamic force among joc4-2013_v3c.indd 116 twenty seven.12.2013 17:17:41 117 the organization that is revolving, participating and interactive and it’s formed up by the staff and management gestures, behaviours and attitudes. structure culture is that the basic pattern of shared assumptions, values and beliefs thought-about to be the right method of brooding about and performing on issues and opportunities facing the organization. it’s what’s vital and unimportant within the organization. it’s typically thought of as organization’ DNA- i.e. invisible to the eye, nonetheless a strong example that shapes what happens within the geographic point. therefore why Schneider and Smith (2004) argues that culture begins with leadership and passed on to the structure members; it’s seen as a group of forces that form and confirm human behavior. The culture of a corporation is caused as a results of various factors a number of that embody the influences of national culture, previous events within the organization, the various personalities and also the socialization individual members tough as a results of past instructional and work settings (Mahler, 1997). It includes the assumptions, values and beliefs of organization. Assumptions ar the shared mental models, the broad worldviews or theories in use that individuals have faith in to guide their perceptions and behaviours, for instance, staff assume that the company’s integrity to employees/staff compensation administration is one amongst the keys to the company’s survival and success. Organization’s beliefs represent the individual’s perceptions of reality. Organizations take issue in their cultural content in terms of the relative ordering of beliefs, values and assumptions. as an example, some organization practices place a premium on their achievement and choice, coaching and development programmes, compensation administration and even, performance management. Also, some place a premium on career development, goal setting and pay-for-performance, all with the intent of increasing worker performance and client service. this may facilitate to form a culture of high performance across the organization. Some organizations support worker eudaimonia with free treatment, personal trainers, cheap eating house, unlimited sick days, heavily backed day care, etc. structure culture affects company performance. company culture may be a deeply embedded style of group action that influences worker selections and behavior. Culture is pervasive and operates unconsciously. it’s associate degree automatic pilot directive staff in ways in which ar in line with structure expectations. structure culture is that the social glue that bonds folks along and makes them feel a part of the structure expertise. staff ar driven to internalise the organization’s dominant culture as a result of it fulfils their wants for social identity. This social glue is the way to draw in new workers and retain prime performers. Again, company culture assists the sense-making method. It helps staff perceive structure events. they will get on with the task at hand instead of pay time attempting to work out what’s expected of them. staff may communicate additional expeditiously and reach higher levels of cooperation with one another as a result of they share common me
ntal models of reality. associate degree structure culture may influence the achievement and choice activities of a corporation. This is sensible as a result of sensible behavior is driven by moral values. a corporation will guide the conduct of its staff by embedding moral values in its culture.

Organizational culture has ability to extend job satisfaction, and awareness regarding drawback determination and organization performance (Kotter, 2012). If the structure culture becomes incompatible with the dynamic expectations of internal and/or external stakeholders, the organization’s success can decrease because it went on with some organizations (Ernst, 2001).

Organization performance and organization culture area unit clearly attached Kopelman, Brief, & Guzzo, 1990), although the confirmation regarding the right nature of this relationship is miscellaneous. analysis shows that the relation between several cultural qualities and high performance aren’t persistent over time (Dension & Sorenson, 1990, 2002)

We can say that the impact of structure culture on worker behavior and performance is predicated on four necessary concepts (Bulach, Lunenburg, & Potter, 2012). Firstly, having information of the organization culture permits staff to know the history and functioning of the organization. this {information} provides information regarding projected future behaviors. Secondly, structure culture raises devotion to the organization’s philosophy and values. This commitment creates shared feelings of achieving common goals. It suggests that organizations can do larger success only if staff share values. Thirdly, structure culture, with its norms, deal as a sway mechanism to direct behaviors toward expected behaviors and far from unfavorable behaviors. this may even be achieved by recruiting, selecting, and retentive staff whose values match with the values of the organization. this sort of structure culture is also coupled on to larger potency and performance than others.

Organizational development has bound factors that improve property on the premise of effectiveness. The enhancements in productivity cause worker commitment as norms, values and objectives facilitate in up culture of a company. The system of organization was primarily based upon effective institution of culture that continue learning surroundings sturdy. The performance of staff improves by institution of sturdy culture of a company. the worker performance is taken into account to be the backbone of the organization because it results in the expansion and development of organization. Thus, the loyalty of worker depends upon information and awareness of culture that improves behavior of organization, (Brooks, 2006). the attention of quality helps in up structure and worker development. The degree of Associate in Nursing accomplishment to that Associate in Nursing worker fulfils the structure mission at geographical point is what’s observed as performance, (Cascio, 2006). The assignment of Associate in Nursing worker is build up by degree of accomplishment of a specific target or mission that defines boundaries of performance, although the aptitude of a company to determine an ideal relationship with resources presents effective and economical management of resources, (Cascio, 2006, Daft, 2000; and Stannack, 2006). However, so as to realize goals and objectives of organization, ways need to be designed primarily based upon structure performance.

Problem Statement

Organizations want continuous commitment from their workers to develop and fulfill their objectives. Management would really like its workers to spot with the values, norms and artefacts of the organization, thus the requirement for structure culture. Management has to justify and imbibe its culture in its employees; this can alter the worker to urge at home with the structure system. it’s the right understanding of the structure culture that the performance of the worker within the organization. to control with success across cultures, it’s necessary to be able to acknowledge cultural variations and be filmable (Deter, Schroeder, and Mauriel, 2000). Organisational culture finds expression through the thoughts, intentions, actions and interpretations of members of the organization (Hallett, 2003).

Academic interest in company culture is proven by the amount of attention it’s received over the previous few decades. the connection between company culture, motivation and job performance has been the topic of voluminous analysis in many fields, together with strategic management, organisational behaviour, and industrial organizations. whereas this subject is made in studies, several researchers concur on the very fact that there’s no agreement on the precise nature of the connection between company culture, motivation and job performance. Despite the embarrassment of studies on company culture within the previous few decades, there’s no wide accepted causative relationship between company culture, motivation and job performance. The empirical evidences rising from varied studies regarding the result of company culture on motivation and job performance have to date yielded mixed results that ar inconclusive and contradictory.

Because of these contradictory results, the question of whether or not company culture improves or worsens employee’s motivation and job performance remains warrant any analysis like the one being undertaken during this study.

Today’s organization is preponderantly dynamic because it poses giant opportunities and challenges to the company practitioners and policy manufacturers. Understanding such dynamism is incredibly crucial to pursue the structure strategic objectives. There are researches in literature to explore the result of structure culture on varied human resource development programmes of a company. for instance, students together with Hofstede, 1980; Ouchi, 1981; Hofstede and Bond, 1988, Kotter and Heskett, 1992; Magee, 2002, claim that structure culture facilitate to supply chance and broad structure for the event of human resources’ technical and activity skills in a company. This is sensible as a result of smart behavior is driven by moral values. a company will guide the conduct of its workers by embedding moral values in its culture. However, structure excellences can be varied since cultural traits can be supply of competitive advantage through casual ambiguity, (Barney, 1991; and Peters and worker, 1982). the planet is dynamical chop-chop and also the level of organizations is additionally dynamical because of technological advancements that have affected their human resource developments programmes. Moreover, organizations disagree in their cultural content in terms of the relative ordering of beliefs, values and assumptions. structure culture adapts overtime to address the dynamic changes and meet the variable demands of the organization in its seek gaining competitive advantage all told its activities.


However, so as to satisfy the structure objectives and come through competitive blessings, all organizations ar thriving to recruit extremely performing arts people. On the opposite hand, people want validatory structure culture to assist them reach individual objectives. Thus, a company may be a consciously coordinated system wherever characteristics of people, teams and organization move with one another and effective interaction among them extremely depends on structure culture that shapes the individual performance, (Kozlowski and Klein, 2000).

Carr, Schmidt, Ford, and DeShon, (2003) submitted that the culture of a company has direct relationship with the performance appraisal system, compensation, worker motivation, coaching and development, versatile time system, structure structure, worker satisfaction, etc. Going by the aforesaid, we have a tendency to propose the subsequent hypothesis; Hypothesis 1: structure culture has no significance influence on the accomplishment and choice activity
of a company.

However, Siegal and Sussman (2003), declared gaining competitive advantage that surrounds information adoption and helps to integrate the structure culture and social presence will really justify data sharing method that comes via coaching and development programmes.

Thus, we have a tendency to return up with the proposition; Hypothesis 2: coaching and development programmes of a company ar directly plagued by the structure culture.

Objectives of the study:

This study seeks to explore relationship between organization culture and its impact on employee’s motivation and job performance. the target of the study was to check the organization culture as perceived by the staff operating within the organization. Another objective was to check the impact of organization culture on job performance. research worker tries to develop the structure culture variable construct that that affects the staff for enhancing work motivation and his performance. For this 229 respondents operating with completely different producing, commercialism and repair organization within the district were designated for the sample. so as to gather the info for this study, the survey form methodology was adopted. AN interview schedule was conjointly developed supported the analysis of the responses within the survey questionnaire. The form and interview schedule were valid to make sure that the instruments were acceptable for his or her functions. The dependableness of the form was zero.876 indicating that the form would live what it absolutely was imagined to live. Before the form was distributed to the sample, it absolutely was piloted on twenty 5 students to get feedback on the clarity of the things.

General objective

The overall aim of this study is to look at Impact of structure culture modification and its impact on the employees’ motivation.

Specific objectives

Specifically, the particular objectives of the study were supposed to:

• To establish the demographic characteristic of study.

• To conclude the matter being baby-faced by staff within the current practices of modification of culture in a corporation.

• To establish the factors that make hurdle in motivation of staff and also the different management.

• To probe out the social control selections relating to body call and policies adopted to encourage the staff.

• To counsel some recommendation on the idea of findings.


This study seeks to explore relationship between organization culture and its impact on employee’s motivation and job performance. the target of the study was to check the organization culture as perceived by the staff operating within the organization. Another objective was to check the impact of organization culture on job performance. research worker tries to develop the structure culture variable construct that that affects the staff for enhancing work motivation and his performance. For this 229 respondents operating with completely different producing, commercialism and repair organization within the district were designated for the sample. so as to gather the info for this study, the survey form methodology was adopted. AN interview schedule was conjointly developed supported the analysis of the responses within the survey form.

The form and interview schedule were valid to make sure that the instruments were acceptable for his or her functions. The dependableness of the form was zero.876 indicating that the form would live what it absolutely was imagined to live. Before the form was distributed to the sample, it absolutely was piloted on twenty 5 students to get feedback on the clarity of the things. a number of minor errors were detected. once the errors were corrected, the form was administered to the sample.

The responses to those parameters were gathered, coded, tabulated and analyzed. to check the hypothesis varied applied mathematics techniques like Mean, variance, correlational analysis and χ2 take a look at and ANOVA was applied.


The paper incontestible that various attributes of structure culture have vital positive influence over the performance of organization. The paper has planned out completely different cultural aspects of organizations still as showed the very important relationship between culture and performance. The qualitative analysis expedited the paper with its strong and in-depth observations. Through strong and in-depth observations, the paper explained however employees’ beliefs, norms, gestures and every one relevant aspects of structure culture compact on firm’s performance. The findings of the paper considerably demonstrate each positive and negative mannerism of culture that has vital consequences on staff still as companies performance. The paper has lined an in depth vary of cultural traits that embody from activity aspects to gestural attributes. The paper conjointly asserts that structure culture is AN open system approach that has dependent and interactive association with organizations performance. the delicate and intensive nature of the paper would add worth to organization studies discipline by providing a vital qualitative perception towards structure culture and performance and would initiate more discussions to make an efficient framework between structure culture and its impact on performance. However, the paper might need some limitations. for example, outcomes of the analysis area unit drawn by observation, the thoughts and perceptions of the various social control level of the organization. Therefore, this method may well be littered with some sensory activity errors of high level personnel of the organization. nonetheless, the paper contributes to the sphere of management analysis within the context.

About Essay Sauce

Essay Sauce is the free student essay website for college and university students. We've got thousands of real essay examples for you to use as inspiration for your own work, all free to access and download.

...(download the rest of the essay above)

About this essay:

This essay was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.

If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay Sauce, Impact of structure culture on human resource practices. Available from:<> [Accessed 06-07-20].

Review this essay:

Please note that the above text is only a preview of this essay.

Review Title
Review Content

Latest reviews: