Essay: LEARNING WORDS IN ENGLISH – A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW

Essay details:

  • Subject area(s): Linguistics essays
  • Reading time: 22 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published on: July 24, 2019
  • File format: Text
  • Number of pages: 2
  • LEARNING WORDS IN ENGLISH - A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW
    0.0 rating based on 12,345 ratings
    Overall rating: 0 out of 5 based on 0 reviews.

Text preview of this essay:

This page of the essay has 6273 words. Download the full version above.

2.1. The Importance of Vocabulary Instruction
Words are the means of transmission of concepts in the background. At the beginner level, communication is attempted by exploiting the cumulative usage effect of words. Scrivener, \”Go to Disco yesterday. And with friends. Dance \”expression, although it is totally distant from the grammatical content, can often give the message it wants to give.
This whole meaning can be given by words alone. On the other hand, good language knowledge may not be such a powerful tool.
Scrivener,this opinion,\”can you lend it to me?\” without the words in the blanks of the sentence, arguing that it supports and sometimes mean very little alone\”calculator! even that would be adequate to give the desired message of the statement believes.
A student who believed in the communicative power of vocabulary, many words will drive learning. How many words can I learn if I want to tell you as clearly as I can tell it what he will think. However, vocabulary learning is not an easy task.
Scrivener , “in some cases we want our use of the word we might hatirlasak even her own sentences. Therefore, in the classroom, the role of vocabulary is important and very much” alone is not enough information about the meaning of the word and the word emphasizes that it is also important that other information about.
Having vocabulary and vocabulary in English learning and teaching has great importance and should be considered on its own. Vocabulary teaching should not be added to classes related to grammar or other skills.

The task of the teacher is to help the student learn a new word when it is encountered, to allow it to be repeated and stored, and to be recalled and used as needed.
2.2 Grammar-Translation Method and Word Learning
From 1800\’s to 1940\’s, the most common language teaching method was the Grammar-Translation Method. This method gave great importance to vocabulary teaching and learning. The selected words to be taught were selected from the reading pieces to be used. Words were taught through bilingual vocabulary lists, dictionary exercises and memorization.
In those years, it was thought that the only way to learn and use language was to learn vocabulary. It was deemed sufficient for pupils to learn a certain number of word learnings and their corresponding responses in their native language. It was also important to know how they came together in the sentence as well as knowing the meaning and words of the English language.
In this way language learners produce natural speech and have difficulty understanding such speech.
Experts, in the 1950s, began to realize that word teaching was not as simple as it seemed. Teaching vocabulary was not just about teaching another word on the other. At the end of these years, it became clear that word learning is more than learning any other word in the mother tongue, the opposite of the target. Teachers were reminded that teaching vocabulary was very complicated and that it would be right to devote most of the time to teach grammar rather than vocabulary teaching.

2.3 Direct Method and Word Learning
From the middle of the nineteenth century, criticisms and reforms began to emerge in many European countries against the Grammar-Translation Method.
In these years, the attention of specialists has been turned into natural learning principles observed in acquiring the mother tongue. This trend led to the development of the Direct Method, a concept under the name of natural learning methods.
He was opposed to memorizing the rules of the English language or trying to learn the language through translation. Instead, he advocated learning by establishing a direct relationship between the learned language and life, without using the mother tongue.
This method was based on the principle of acquiring the language and words naturally through interaction. In this method, concrete words were tried to be taught by demonstration, by using real objects and pictures, and by using abstract words from associations.
2.4 Auditory-Linguistic Method and Word Learning
During World War II, a new method called the United States, \”Auditory-Linguistic Method\” emerged. The Auditory-Linguistic Method was the most effective method of the period until 1970\’s. In this method, language learning was based on the principle of making habit. The Auditory-Linguistic Method prioritises the verbal direction of the language (understanding and speaking), and aims to teach these skills in a particular order with reciprocal speech and oral exercises.
The Auditory-Linguistic Method, like the Grammar-Translation Method, left the grammar-related work in the shadows while highlighting the grammar. New words were spoken indirectly. The Auditory-Linguistic Method defended that grammar structures had to be taught first, and vocabulary learning had to be left later.
The words selected for teaching were selected according to the usage frequency criterion. Vocabulary teaching was limited. Lessons are taught in the classroom
And then expanded to words related to school, home, community and work life. In the later stages, the words about the country and nation should be taught. Finally, the goal should have turned into international communication.
2.5 Communicative Approach and Word Learning
In the 1970s and 1980s, the Communicative Approach began to emphasize the importance of learning from the natural path. Teachers have started using activities that involve students trying to understand the words of the piece through clue words.
The use of monolingual dictionaries was suggested instead of the bilingual dictionaries. Literature books have begun to focus on the extraction of meaning from the context. In language learning, the effect of behavioral psychology was to leave its place in the sociolinguistic domain.
Although the communicator approach has given the necessary attention to grammar and vocabulary teaching, the main goal was to enable the student to use language effectively to communicate on the target language. This approach argues that words and their meanings are not taught directly because they can be learned more effectively indirectly through grammatical or communicative activities.
Larsen-Freeman (1986) \”did not mean that it would provide the best communication, knowing the most grammatical structure and the word, as he stated. As a result, learning language in language learning has lost its progress in becoming the most basic component of language learning once again with the prominence of communication skills in this period. Nonetheless, the Communicator Approach has made it possible for vocabulary teaching to be re-groomed.
2.6 Today\’s Word Teaching and Its Importance
In recent years, vocabulary teaching has been regarded as a very important part of language teaching and has taken its place in foreign language teaching. This has been due to the development of understanding-based approaches, applied linguists and computer-based vocabulary studies that hit the turn mark.
Advocates who have adopted a comprehension-based approach to language acquisition argue that in the early stages, common vocabulary learning will be effective in bringing out the abilities of students. In other words, if a student has extensive vocabulary, it will be possible to reach the main text in verbal or written texts without knowing the grammatical structures. (Richards and Renandya, 2002: 254).
And nowadays, in every environment where language learning is discussed, word teaching and learning have been mentioned, and this growing interest in this field has made word learning one of the most basic elements of language proficiency.
Carter (1987) and Laufer (1986) also support this view and emphasize the significance of the work in this area, as \”the fact that the vocabulary is small for those who want to learn a foreign language is an important shortcoming\”.

PART 3: WORD LEARNING IN ENGLISH
In English, word learning that should be addressed before moving on to another important
the subject is also \”the word\” concept. It is possible to see many different categories and different definitions of the word. Knowing that face us under the headings and categories of the word and the word which would be to have basic information about, to ensure the teaching of the word followed in the clearing of the roads is an important factor.
Then in Word, under the various headings based on the identification and classification these classifications a general classification for the purpose of determination of the top titles to talk of vocabulary and Word will be useful.

3.1 Word Information
In general, it is believed that knowing a word is equivalent to knowing the meaning of that word. However, word information is much more complex than that. That is to say, knowing the meaning of a word is not enough to know that word.Thornbury points out that, in the most general sense, the word structure and the semantic knowledge must begin with an examination of the word.
It is not enough to know the meaning of any word alone. At the same time, the meaning of the word must also be known. If the meaning of any word is known, there is a need for other information. For example, is the concept mentioned in the meaning of the word or is it action or is it both? Here comes the conclusion that knowing the meaning of a word means knowing the grammatical task of that word. In addition, the multiple meanings of a word and word phrases that have different meanings when combined with arrays that comprise the es. In other words, mean to know a word, the dictionary meaning of that Word\’s not to say that
just know, but also where other words are often used together so esdizim, yananlam, whether oral or written, belongs to language, and cultural background to know the properties belonging to it means.
3.1.1 Components Of Vocabulary
Vocabulary associated with the components of Richards (1976), 8 from context is referring to: in a word, to know when and where which words would come together; the word which is suitable for use in the environment to be able to make a decision; appropriate syntactic behavior of the word, the deep structure, deviation, Association networks,semantic properties and spatial egretilemel it is important to know the meanings.
Taylor also mentioned 7 subtitles, which can be listed as follows: the frequency of word encounter, the section of the word, the synonym, the morphology, the semantics, the semantics and the equivalent of the word.
In this way, the categories determined by various researchers in various forms, in fact, merge into almost common points. This commonality is that word knowledge means that the word can be used for communicative purposes in four basic skills (reading, writing, listening, speaking) on the target in a productive sense, as Oxford and Crookall (1990).
It is often assumed that the concept of word information consists of a simple word list. However, besides the words that have meaning alone, there are also groups of words that consist of more than one word and have a meaning on each side.
In fact, summer has proved to us that there is no universal definition of the word. For example, Folse (2004) defined the word as a building block that formed certain expressions, altered expressions, idioms, and spontaneous actions, whereas Thornbury (2002) referred to the word as a lexicon that has a single meaning and constitutes a word or group of words. Despite the difference in terminology, the above-mentioned classifications show us that the words need other neighbors to make their meaning clear.
3.1.2 Word Grammar
It should be known that multi-word structures are also important for communicating naturally on the learned language. For example, students have to know their structure, meaning and use in order to learn about their actions. Thornbury (2002) notes that it is necessary to know whether such knowledge of gross behavior is transitive or intransitive, whether it is separable or indivisible, and what is the emphasis and knowledge of the reunion.
Knowing the meaning of a word means knowing its true meaning and its altered or multiple meanings. Finally, the use of the word is known whether it is used in official or informal speech, and whether it works according to the principle of dominance(Thornbury, 2002:13-15).
The word knowledge also requires knowing the synonym of that word. This information allows you to know your word, other words that will be found in the conversation or in the text. In other words, the synonym is the presence of words that are normal to the natural speaker. Knowing the obvious synonyms gives you the comfort and power to use the student language. This information reduces both the chances of the student making mistakes and ensures that the language is closer to the natural speaker.
Because the use of fluent and correct language requires the correct use of these structures. Another point to mention here is the accumulative nature of word learning. Researchers advocate that in order to fully learn and understand a word, it is necessary to provide many encounters.

3.2 Words of Memory Recall Place and Priority

One of the biggest problems facing a learner who learns a word will be difficult to remember the words he or she later learns. In the case of an effective learning, learning is equivalent to remembering. Learning a word is a cumulative process. For example, while learning a certain amount of rules during grammar learning, word learning can be perceived more as a memory process that requires the ability to hold words in memory.
So, the important thing to keep in mind about keeping the words in memory is to examine how the memory works and to decide how the results will be reflected in word teaching (Thornbury, 2002: 23).

3.3 Don\’t forget

Forgetting new words learned is very common and natural. Remember, at first it is fast but it tends to slow down over time. Remember, it can happen at the end of a whole period, as it can be after short learning (until a dersten elapses). According to calculations made, 80% of the learned knowledge is forgotten within the first 24 hours, but then this rate is decreasing.
The results of some studies on Spanish learners in English language show that during the first 3-4 years when there is no use of language, forgetting occurs but then forgetting is diminishing. There are two factors that determine the keeping of words in their minds. The easiest of these is the easier recall of words that are easy to learn. Another determinant is that words that have been spread over a long period of learning are learned more easily than words that are trying to be taught in a short time.

This is parallel to the principle of distrubuted practice (Thornbury, 2002: 26). Remember, it can be caused by later learning, by hitting the former, or by inadequate re-doing. One thing to mention about kicking is about overloading. During these surpluses, it may be that the old learned words are forgotten instead of old ones. This can happen, especially if the recently learned words show similarities to those learned previously.
Newly learned words also have features such as being based on the earlier ones (Thornbury, 2002: 26).
Repetition is the most important factor in remembering. Surveys show that repetition of learned information intermittently reduces the rate of forgetfulness.
This repetition mentioned is nothing more than vocalizing the words or re-reading the parts they pass through. Such a repetition should be in the form of reinforcement of the meaning of the word with more different examples, and therefore the meaning deepens in the mind of the learner. Researchers show that learning can be more effective if the student repeats the word he or she has learned in a different setting or environment than the one he first met (Thornbury, 2002: 26).

CHAPTER 4: DIFFERENT METHODS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING

Hunt and Begler (1998) refer to three different approaches to teaching and learning vocabulary. These are classified as coincidental learning, word learning through teaching, and word learning through strategy development. The American Heritage Dictionary of English Language describes incidental words of chance.

Random word learning occurs as a byproduct of the realization of other skills such as speech, reading and listening. The most basic source of coincidental word learning is widely read, and this technique is an activity that is recommended to be organized regularly as an out-of-class activity. On the other hand, vocabulary learning through instruction is a kind of learning that has been specially planned and determined and aimed at by the student and the teacher.

4.1. Direct and Indirect Learning

Studies of direct and indirect learning have emerged as a topic of cognitive psychology and these two types of learning try to explain the answer to the question whether information is stored in memory abstract form or in special form. In these two learnings, it is also being investigated whether knowledge is an outcome of an awareness of the process, or an outgrowth of the process. In defining these two concepts, whether conscious or not is a distinctive factor. Indirect learning is also defined as the acquisition of hidden information belonging to the underlying structure in a complex warning, without consciousness, in a natural and simple process.
Direct learning is more aware and conscious thought on the structure (Rieder, 2003: 25). Seger (1994) explains indirect learning as a complex process in which the learning process takes place without being spoken of and not for teaching. Indirect learning is a more passive process than direct learning. In the form of this learning, the person is exposed to the knowledge and the knowledge reaches the end of this exposure. Many psychologists state that a person\’s knowledge over the course of his life has a lot of indirect learning.
Learning to ride a bicycle and learning a language are some of the skills learned mostly indirectly, and they learn that people know how to do it but can not easily explain how it is done. Direct learning, on the other hand, is a form of learning that is consciously thought out on the structure (Ellis, 1994b: 1).
Indirect learning is independent of age and intelligence and is not affected by disorders such as memory loss. In contrast, direct learning is affected by such diseases. In indirect learning, the age of the learner is not important, but age is important in direct learning (Reber, 1993: 237).

4.1.1 The Relationship Between Word Learning and Direct-Indirect Learning Through Randomized Teaching

Direct and indirect learning, the first times it emerged, was interested in the acquisition of grammatical structures. Reber (1967) became the first researcher to do studies on this field, with the theory that the results of his experiments investigating the learning of grammar were the result. In his work,
Reber proved that grammar structures were learned without conscious intervention and abstracted. Since Reber\’s work, studies on direct and indirect learning have begun to increase significantly (Rieder, 2003: 24).

The difference between these two forms of learning has been a topic of discussion and controversy in word learning. Krashen (1985), as a natural learning advocate, has emerged as an advocate of indirect learning. By contrast, West\’s General Service List Compilation leads to the emergence and interest of the vocabulary advocates for this point of view. For the last 15 years, researchers have been working on teaching strategies through teaching (West, 1953).
The distinction between direct and indirect learning is a topic that is often discussed in the field of foreign language teaching, in the context of grammar learning and vocabulary learning. There is a great deal of discussion about learning the word and whether it should be done in the natural way or through learning through teaching. At the end of these discussions, the direct and indirect learning headings in word learning have changed, and instead, the terms of word learning have been used instead of random learning and teaching.

Especially coincidental word learning has been a field of research on foreign language teaching, and psychology has begun to separate this learning from direct and indirect learning. While learning vocabulary through teaching, on vocabulary and vocabulary, emphasizing the purpose of teaching, coincidental vocabulary learning is the unawareness of the learner when he gives the attention of the learner to the use of language (Rieder, 2003: 45).

4.2 Learning Random Word
Language emerges and evolves as a result or byproduct of the individual\’s socialization process (Wode, 1999). Children learn the language used in their surroundings by discovering the world around them. Socialization is an ongoing process and people, even in adulthood, have to adapt to the changes in their environment. Language acquisition and development, if the language being taught is a native language or a foreign language, it will develop with this harmony.
This means that learning in the natural environment or the classroom environment is mostly natural because the language is not learning the language during this integration process. Language is learned naturally in this process.
Students are considered to be \”coincidental learning\” (Celce-Murcia, 2001: 288) to learn any word without direct instruction, only by reading extensively, or by \”unaware\” activities such as communicative activities or television watching.
The phrase \”unaware\” used in the definition of coincidental learning can be understood in two different ways.

4.2.1 Awareness in Language Acquisition

Upon acceptance of the judiciary without knowledge of coincidental word learning, the concept of awareness in language acquisition has become a subject of interest to various researchers.
It will be appropriate to begin with the four distinctive features of the concept of awareness in language acquisition. These can be listed as: – intentional, intentional, – careful, – within the control, – directive or directive.

While there is a clear linguistic awareness of learning through teaching, coincidental learning is often known as an automatic process that occurs during learning without the knowledge of the acquisition process and the resulting knowledge. For this reason, it is suggested that there is a learning process in which there is no conscious word learning awareness. In contrast, attention to the realization of learning is also a prerequisite (Schmit, 2001).
Attention and awareness, although seemingly synonymous, are known to be a precondition for awareness. In learning coincidental words, the concept of attention must be found in the first stage to notice the stimulus, but not all of the process is mentioned in awareness.

4.2.2 Input Hypothesis

Learning a word is a complicated process. In learning a word, many features such as its frequency of use, relation to other words, pronunciation, contextual and task usage characteristics, synonymous behavior and semantic features must be considered (Richards, 1976; Carter, 1987; It will be very difficult to have such an intensive knowledge retreat, learning word by teaching only, taking the meanings of words and other important features into memory.
Rather, it is becoming more effective and easier to give words in a coincidental way by internalizing them with listening or reading activities that reach the actual goal. The main purpose of learning a coincidental word is not to teach predetermined words, but to learn the words naturally during reading and listening activities of pupils and to reach the message (Huckin and Coady, 1999). Krashen (1989) concludes that, as a result of his work on the subject, the learning of the word in a coincidental way with reading and the vocabulary of the vowel are bound to understandable input.
The basis on which this assertion is based is that Krashen (1985) can be obtained by the comprehension of linguistic structures, including understandable input, prior to the language\’s interlanguage system. According to this view, which is called the understandable input hypothesis, the language is not aware of it, and it is the message that needs to be conveyed in the context and not in the structure in which the attention is obtained. For this reason, the process assuming an understandable input shows similarities with coincidental learning.

4.2.3 Restructuring Reading Texts

Restructuring in reading texts is one of the factors that facilitate coincidental learning. Examples of such changes include the creation of a dictionary of the words in the text and presentation of the student with the text. Research shows that vocabulary has developed by learning through coercive means, mostly by reading, by trying to get students out of the unknown vocabulary.
Restructuring on the text is some of the techniques that make it easy to learn, for example, additions, subtractions, assistive techniques, and learning of random words (Ellis, 1994). In the learning of words from the coincidental way, it is accepted as a fairly traditional approach to learning words only by reading. Nowadays, it is trying not to realize coincidental learning by using activities that require different skills. Some of them are to use the dictionary to look at the meaning of the words, to express the reading with their own expressions. Research shows that the more effective these kinds of activities are, the greater the number of learners.

It would also be useful to make some changes to the reading comprehension so that the learning of the word from the random path is more effective.
These may be syntactic, phonetic, and stille-related changes, as well as rewriting of the books (Jacobs, 1991: 8). Ellis (1994) on the restructuring of reading texts suggests three types of input change: simplification, tuning, and elaboration.
Simplification is the reduction or abolishment of structures or words that are difficult to change with syntactic and lexical changes. Adjustment can be explained as giving more general concepts by choosing basic or simple structures and reducing formal and idiomatic structures. The elaboration is the use of synonyms to extend the whole and to facilitate the meaning (Ellis, 1994: 225-228).

4.3 Learning Vocabulary with Teaching Path
It is based on learning the word through teaching, the attention of the students, the activities on which the words are presented (Sökmen, 1997). Teaching-learning is a very important part of vocabulary teaching programs. In this method, fast and long-term word learning is provided by reinforcements supported by meaningful input. Learning how to teach, how to teach and how to teach will be determined in advance, and it is aimed to have a broad vocabulary of the learners.
Many techniques such as learning vocabulary through teaching, combining old learners with new vocabulary, frequent repetition of words, formation of a deeper procedural skill, and animation are helpful (Celce-Murcia, 2001: 286-287).
Direct word learning provides effective learning in a real sense. In this way, each word is emphasized for a certain period of time and the structural, phonological and contextual features of the word. Another aim of learning vocabulary through teaching is to increase the level of consciousness of the students about certain words and to make them recognize them easily in their next encounter with those words.

Learning vocabulary through instruction leads to the beginning of a cumulative learning. Another advantage of this learning is that this type of vocabulary learning helps to learn vocabulary and helps students to acquire the ability to grasp the strategic and systematic characteristics of the language. These features can be listed as sound, word alignment, word type information, underlying concept and semantic information, and syntactic constructions (Schmitt, 2002: 42).
Only a small part of the vocabulary of a language and the semantic information of this vocabulary can be learned by teaching. The knowledge of vocabulary is so great that it is impossible to learn it all this way. Every word learned through instruction may not be able to reach the learner\’s lexical competence. For this reason, it would be wrong to expect that all of the word information will be learned this way.

4.3.1 Number of Words to Teach
When learning vocabulary through teaching, the number of vocabulary to be taught needs to be determined in advance. In this learning method, there are many questions about both the teacher and the student, about the number of words to be taught and learned, and what they should be. This is at the beginning of the decisions that need to be made before learning the word.
Many researchers today argue that a large number of vocabulary learning is required in the first stages of language learning (at least 3000 high frequency words) (Richards and Renandya, 2002: 259).

Among the ways in which the words to be taught can be identified, the province may be to use lists where the most commonly used words are identified. The most famous and most commonly used word list is West\’s (1953) \”General Service List of English Words\”. This list gives about 2000 words, along with meaning and frequency information, from millions of words.
Although it is quite old, it still can not be filled. Nation (1990) argues that knowing the words in this list means knowing about 80% of the words in any written text, which in turn contributes to the motivation of students (Richards and Renandya, 2002: 259).

In order to have general academic vocabulary knowledge, it is necessary to know the 3,000 most commonly used words, because this proportion constitutes a large majority of the words of an average text. Laufer (1990) found that at least 3,000 words

It is necessary for effective reading at university level, and for 5000 words to be able to achieve academic achievement (Richards and Renandya, 2002: 260). Another way to determine the number of words that need to be taught is to use the Nation (1990) word-level test or checklist (Richards and Renandya, 2002: 259).

Some researchers argue that for some group students, the 2000 word is not enough. It is considered that university students learning language for a specific purpose require more than 1000 words of learning with a high frequency of use (Celce- Murcia, 2001: 287).

4.3.2 Strategies for Learning Vocabulary with Teaching Path

Techniques used to learn vocabulary through instruction should be focused directly on the word. It is important that the words are frequently exposed with clues to facilitate understanding and given in a specific context and the word to be learned. Words associated with each other should be taught with words and phrases along the lines and in parts. Many computer programs that have been used recently, including spoken words, spoken words, and spoken in a certain context, reflect the basic principles of such learning (celce-Murcia, 2001: 286-287).

Deep processing is very important for learning vocabulary through teaching. It is known that short-term and long-term memory is important for learning. The short-term memory has a small storage capacity and holds words for a short time during processing (usually about 23 seconds).

To start the deep processing process, it is necessary to transfer the information from the memory to the memory for a short period of time. The more often learners face word, the more often they think about the word, the easier it will be to transfer it to long-term memory. Research indicates that effective word learning is a time-spreading process. This process should be a process in which the word is repeated at regular intervals (celce-Murcia, 2001: 289).

4.3.2.1 Repetition and Learning to Learn
The most common way to learn vocabulary learning strategy is to build on practice of repetition and vocabulary. What is done here is the memorization of words using word lists or the test of the learner by word cards.
Baddeley (1990) notes that the repetition of the use of word cards has strengthened the connection between the form and the meaning of the word (Schmitt, 2002: 41).
However, Bahrick (1984) conducted several researches on frequent repetition and concluded that the effect on the first encounter was more effective than the learning on the first encounter (Cook, 2001: 69).

4.3.2.2 Association Technique
Research on word learning shows that words are the most effective way to learn by grouping and relating to each other in the mind (Cook, 2001: 69). Especially at the begin- ning level, it is accepted that the learning of the words by the associative technique provides a short and effective learning, so that the words can be stored for a long time. Trying to learn by using structural similarities between words is also considered to be an effective way (Cook, 2001: 70).

It is easier to keep related words in memory and to internalize them. Nation (1990) notes that knowing the words \”meaning\” and \”hopeful\” will make it easier to learn the word \”meaningful\”. The association technique can also be configured with a list of words to be learned.
For example, students may be given a list such as the following, and the words in these two words may be asked to identify the ones associated with each other (celce- Murcia, 2001: 288).

Table 1: Word list to be associated with each other (DeCarrico, 2001)

Cough blue
Grass pepper
Red tea
Salt kitten
Puppy sneeze
Coffee green

However, the words that need to be associated with each other must have definite semantic associations, and it is recommended that no synonyms and opposite semantics are listed. Research shows that similarities between words need to be avoided, as they affect cross-association.
As a result, similar words (synonyms and opacities) should not be presented together, as they may cause problems with word learning (Nation 1990, Schmitt, 2000).

4.3.2.3 Meaning Maps

This technique is to ensure that the words in the piece are brought together with conscious relations and learned through semantic relations between words. In this technique, a piece of words to be taught is selected and students are asked to identify words that are thought to be related to each other. Similar to this technique, the so-called lexical network can be applied to the beginner level and this technique requires students to find semantic related words for some idiomatic words (Celce-Murcia, 2001: 288).

4.3.2.4 Word Lists
Another way to learn vocabulary through teaching is to use vocabulary lists. For many years, vocabulary lists have become a widely used technique, but today this technique is not widely used. However, studies conducted in recent years show that this technique can be very useful when used effectively (Nation, 1995, Meara, 1995). Shillaw (1995) concluded in 1995 that the use of vocabulary lists is a type of activity that enhances the success of learning vocabulary in a Japanese university study.
In Thornbury (2002), he touched on the use of this technique and its different uses to improve the vocabulary, working on the use of the class, and argued that this technique could not see the necessary importance for many years (Benthuysen, 2002: 90).

4.3.2.5 Word Cards
It is accepted that word lists are a good way for word pairs to learn quickly. However, using vocabulary cards is even more effective than vocabulary lists because in this way, students can adjust their work order themselves (Atkinson, 1972). Research has shown that this activity is an important and useful way to learn vocabulary (Schmitt, 2002: 45), although vocabulary learning has been criticized for being learned by some researchers heartily using vocabulary cards. In addition to the meaning of the word, additional information can be added to the cards, which also allows learning of different features of the word. Information on the type of the sample and the word is some of the information that can be added to the cards (Richards and Renandya, 2002: 260).
In addition to these, with additional information written on the cards, it is possible to associate new words with previously known words.

Beginning with learning semantically unrelated words and leaving the endings to learn words that are close to each other and their meanings come at the forefront of the points to be noted (Richards and Renandya, 2002: 260). For example, the words \”affect\” and \”effect\” in English bear semantic similarities, so trying to learn them together can create confusion in their minds.
Students should do something beyond seeing the word when they use the cards. They should hear their voice or say the word with a loud voice. The syllable structure and emphasis is also important because they are two important ways to store the word in memory (Richards and Renandya, 2002: 260). Rather than learning words in one go, it is more effective to repeat them regularly. Since most of the forgetting will take place shortly after the first exposure of the word, learning should be reinforced regularly after this phase (Richards and Renandya, 2002: 261).
Every repetition helps to strengthen the meaning of the word. It is not possible to see just the meaning and the word of this effect. The best timing is to look at the card for the first few minutes, an hour, the next day, a week and a few weeks later. Such a study is more effective than trying to learn all the words in an hour\’s work. Although the total time is the same, the result will be different. Repeated repetitions provide a long learning time (Schmitt, 20002: 42).

More than 5-7 words at a time and if that word should be learned to be taught, if desired by dividing them into small groups of cards should be used (Richards and Renandya, 2002:260). The first time a small 15-20 card deck tanelik should be used. Difficult words, with a small number of card stock should be used to provide more again. More than 50 cards at a time to keep and since it would be difficult to use together is not recommended. When you are working with a deck that is made up of 5-7 words 59 words
there will be more face time, and therefore, learning will be more effective (Schmitt, 2002:41).
5. CHAPTER: VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION AND LEARNING PROCESSES THROUGH OBSERVATIONS IN A RANDOM WAY
In this part of the study; purpose of the study and the universe, they are the subjects that participated in the research and learning environment, used in research, methods of data collection and findings for the resolution of information.
The purpose of this study as mentioned in the introduction section, experimental qualified, the learning environment and teaching English as a foreign language with the way the word random in the way to learn is to observe the effects of increasing the knowledge of the word. In the study, 10. of class, this word in two different ways to learn words at the end of the learning process that they expected the information has been assessed.

In this study, the learning approach is not intended to compare the effects on learning of these two words. Instead, these two separate in a classroom environment, learning takes place and how the results are intended to assess what are two different word.

5.1. The Properties Of The Experimental Group

Word learning word learning in two different above-mentioned method and to observe the effect of these methods, the teachers who have adopted two different approaches in two different 10. the class has been selected.

...(download the rest of the essay above)

About this essay:

This essay was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.

If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay Sauce, LEARNING WORDS IN ENGLISH – A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW. Available from:<https://www.essaysauce.com/linguistics-essays/learning-words-in-english-a-historical-overview/> [Accessed 24-02-20].

Review this essay:

Please note that the above text is only a preview of this essay.

Name
Email
Review Title
Rating
Review Content

Latest reviews: