Home > Sample essays > Compare Syrian Situation: Afghanistan & Libya Crises & UN Inaction

Essay: Compare Syrian Situation: Afghanistan & Libya Crises & UN Inaction

Essay details and download:

  • Subject area(s): Sample essays
  • Reading time: 7 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 1 April 2019*
  • Last Modified: 23 July 2024
  • File format: Text
  • Words: 1,966 (approx)
  • Number of pages: 8 (approx)

Text preview of this essay:

This page of the essay has 1,966 words.



SYRIAN SITUATION: In comparism to the Afghanistan and Libyan crisis and why the united nations has failed to act/interfere.

Since the Syrian war started in 2011, nearly a quarter million people have perished and thousands forced out of their  homes thereby creating the worst refugee crisis ever seen in the past quarter century . The Syrian civil war and  crisis is still on going and began in early  spring 2011  within the context Arab  spring protest  against president  Bashar al- Assad’s government whose forces responded with  violent crackdowns and force and thus, the protest grew  into an armed rebellion after months of military siege .  when the  crisis started, the Syrian  government relied on her  armed  forces but has used local protection made of volunteers  since 2014 known as National Defence Force. The Syrian government  received support  from Russia, Iran and Iraq, on the 30th  of September, 2015, Russia  started air campaign on the request  of the Syrian government which led to the proxy war  between America and Russia and led  to the situation to be  termed proto world war with nearly  a dozen countries embroiled in two  overlapping  crisis. It is  important to state at this point that international organizations have accused the Syrian government and the other forces of severe human rights violations with mass massacres, all leading to mass displacement of population . Human Right situation in Syria has been the subject of criticism from international organizations. The country for many years banned the gathering of more than five (5)  people   and allowing  security forces to arrest and detain violatiors of the law. Bashar al-Asaad is so believed to have  been unsuccessful in implementing  democratic change with a  human Right watch of 2010 stating clearly that he failed to substantially improve  the standard of human rights since taking  power. Freedom of Expression, Association and Assembly were  strictly controlled by Syria even before the crisis. The authorities  harass, Imprison and intimidate activists and other critics of government. Women are discriminated  against and ethnic minorities widely marginalized.

The protests started on the 15th of March 2011, protesters marched in Damascus, demanding democratic reforms and release of political prisoners. The security forces retaliated with sporadic  shooting, injuring many and arrested many as well. The protests according to reports was triggered by the arrest of a boy and his friends for writing the graffiti, the  graffiti was used to send messages underlying  the social and political  misrule of the government of Bashar a-Asaad. Despite all the messages  sent by the protesters, all Assad  could  say in an address was that  protesters were being pushed by “foreign conspirators” pushing  Israeli  propaganda  for the protests ” the  protesters initially  demanded for release of political detainees  and political  reforms and gave the government  an ultimatum, the  focus shifted from making demands to the call for  the removal  of the Bashar Al- Asaad regime with this spreading to over twenty cities. On the 25th of April, the Syrian Army started  series of large scale deadly  military attacks on towns using  tanks, infantry carriers  and artillery leading to mass and large  number of deaths  of civilians and led to the death of over  1,000 civilians and arrest of many students, liberal activists  and  human  rights advocates . On the 29th  of July 2011, seven officers of the army defected to form an alliance with the aim of bringing the Bashar Al Asaad government to  dust. On the 31st of July, a nationwide crackdown nicknamed the “Ramadan  Massacre” resulted in the death of at least 142 people and hundreds injured. It is important to state that the rebels received support from Turkey and operates its command and headquarters from Turkey. According to rebels, the Syrian government released imprisoned islamist militants and armed them up to fight the rebels. November  and  December  2011 saw increasing  rebels attacks as opposition forces  grew  in large  numbers and launched massive air raids  on an  air force  intelligence complex  in Damascus and on the 15th of December, ambushed military base killing 27  soldiers but suffered a great loss when 72  members were killed. French and British special forces trainers are also rendering assistance to the  Syrian rebels. January 2012, Asaad began using large scale artillery operations against the insurgency, this destroyed many civilian homes . The army  intensified usage of air raids and  tanks  with both  the army and the rebels claiming  victory over a territory and counter claiming. By the  end of April 2013, the estimated death toll had reached 10,000   acting on the United  Nations-Arab  league Joint  special  representative for Syria, Kofi Annan tried a peace plan for ceasefire but even as negotiations  were ongoing, the Syrian armed force attacked a number of towns and villages and killed  hundreds of people and  detention of children even continued, this time in immeasurable  quantity.  The ceasefire agreed upon was a failure with  both sides killing  and maiming  innocent civilians. This led Annan to officially withdraw from Syria and the kangaroo peace move by the United nations aborted.  

After the failure of the ceasefire, killings continued with 108 deaths  recorded at the Houla massacre and 78 civilians were  reportedly  killed in the AL- Qubeir massacre. Not until the 12th June 2012,  the UN has quietly looked and apart from the Annan move,  only  said that and proclaimed that “Syria  is in a state of civil war ”  by  Mid- July  2012, about 16, people have been reportedly killed  and the war had spread into the capital  of Syria. Later, Defence  minister, AL- Saad’s brother-in-law were  killed in a  suicide bomb attack in Damascus. The Syrian intelligence chief, Hisham Ikhtiyar, who  got madly injured  in the suicide  bomb attack later died and a group of the rebel forces claimed responsibility for the attack. Later an UN observer said that Assad has started using  fight jets on his people. On the 6th of September 2012,  about 21 Kurdish activists were killed by the Army loyal to Asaad. On the 18th of November, rebels took control of base 46 in the Aleppo Government, which happens to be one of the Syrian army’s largest bases about 300 Syrian troops were killed in the process and about 60 captured alive. Later  a car bomb  exploded in Damascus war the Baath Syrian Regional  Branch headquarters, killing at least 53 civilians . later, the Asaad  army bombed  a mosque where civilian  protesters were praying  and killed as many as 41 persons. It was  reported  that  in reclaiming  coastal towns of Bayda, Baniyas,  over 100 people were killed by the Syrian Army mostly children  and harmless women. On the 10th June, pro-government fighters  attacked a nearby  rebel group  and killed four rebels .

In trying  to capture the Salma  Region, according to a Human Rights  watch, about 190 civilians were killed including at least 67 being  executed. Another 200 civilians primarily women and children were held hostage .  ISIS later joined in the crisis making it messier and bloodier.

We can go on and on talking about this war and how lives have been lost, properties worth billions of dollars are destroyed day by day and yet the international peace umbrella  and its most  powerful council  have looked unconcerned and if concerned, I think  not too concerned, the UN has only made  comments only when quizzed and made promises upon promises.

REASONS FOR NOT INTERFERING IN THE SYRIAN CRISIS

As it stands today, Syria continues to grind with Bashir Al-Asaad in power with the security forces shifting focus to ISIS and other Islamic extremists groups. It’s been four years  of crisis and war in Syria, with large callas for the intervention  of the United Nations and NATO the United Nations and NATO  remained hesitant to interfere despite parallel conditions similar to that of Libya, infact, that of Syria as it stands today  is over a thousand  percent  worse off than that of Libya.  Despite  this, NATO continued to hold back despite the conflict  or war  over four years and again despite the August 21st  2014 move  agent attack on civilians in Ghurtta attributed by the United  states of America, United kingdom and France to the Assad government, an event previously  identified as a “redline” by  president Obama that would trigger military action.  Despite vivid evidence that the Asaad government crossed the line, NATO stayed out of Syria.

Today, there are many factors contributing to NATO’s decision against  intervening  in the Syria crisis. Despite using the liberal based  (values) rhetoric and human rights justifications for the invasion  of Libya, the Syrian  situation elicited a different response. Domestic  politics  in individual NATO states ran against it. While there was no justification for invading Afghanistan and similarities ( Infact the Syrian situation is worse off that of Libya) with Libya,  excuses based on being  an ally with Asaad has taken over reasonability of the United Nations and NATO.  The Syrian military  was well and better trained, equipped, sophisticated and committed to Asaad than the Libyan military  Gaddafi. This is a very weak excuse as it is well known that many members of the army in Syria has defected  to support  the rebels and even fight against Asaad and if the army is good, why have they  failed to exert peace  in about  four  years of the unrest. Again, NATO said that the influx into Syria of Islamic extremists fighters on the rebel  side restrained it from interfering. This is also laughable and weak,  Afghanistan was invaded simply  because they wanted  Taliban destroyed, simply because, Al- Qaeda was in Afghanistan and despite  the fact that, leading Al –Qaeda a fighters are not Afghan, yet they invaded Afghanistan. It is important to point out that the largest contributing factor was that international resistance to a NATO invasion of Syria compared to that Libya is due to the greater strength of international, regional and internal Allies of the Assad regime. Bashar Asaad is a friend to many powerful forces in the United Nations and within the Security Council. Compared to Gaddafi who called himself an “ International leader, the Dean of Arab rulers, the/ Kings of kings of Africa, an  Imam of Muslims” etc.  Gaddafi won’t stop looking for enemies, had no powerful friends and  an enemy of the United  Nations. NATO faced no opposition  whatsoever in the intervention against Gaddafi and NATO  received  encouragement to act by Arab league and Gaddafi’s lack of domestic  and international support. The dearth of opposition and lack of allies  meant that nothing stood in the way of NATO invasion of Libya. Gaddafi  only has  strength  at home,. He was internationally naked.  It is important  to state that NATO had less at stake in Syria than its opponents and Asaad remaining in power did not greatly  harm NATO interests, even if it did no help them. Despite  the bad  company Assad was keeping, he at least had a steady hand on Syria. Asaad had a strong base at home and also forged international and regional alliances.   

Syria presented a different case for NATO. The same liberal arguments used in Libya were being used  to justify action in Syria  however argued by Eben Cutzee, from a structural Realist perspective,  supporting  liberal democracy and freedom during the Arab spring  had been harmful to security interests and especially NATO’s as it had  already led to gains for militant Islamism in the region  it has led to the rise of Muslim brotherhood in countries like Egypt,  Islamist violence against us  Targets in Libya and Islamic  militants  ties with Al-Qaeda. None of these presents a big threat to NATO.  What NATO did was to create a space for and enabled ISIS  to build  a base and increase their influence in the region and also across the world- something which NATO claims does not harm  security  and interests. That led to the baseless and ill political move  from getting rid of Asaad to defeating ISIS. Again, it has been pushed that the  United Nations is not a democratic global organization and it is not a representation of world citizens.

 

 

About this essay:

If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay Sauce, Compare Syrian Situation: Afghanistan & Libya Crises & UN Inaction. Available from:<https://www.essaysauce.com/sample-essays/2015-12-23-1450867803/> [Accessed 19-04-26].

These Sample essays have been submitted to us by students in order to help you with your studies.

* This essay may have been previously published on EssaySauce.com and/or Essay.uk.com at an earlier date than indicated.