Home > Sample essays > Exploring the Elaine Massacre: US Race Riot and Unrest of 1919

Essay: Exploring the Elaine Massacre: US Race Riot and Unrest of 1919

Essay details and download:

  • Subject area(s): Sample essays
  • Reading time: 12 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 1 April 2019*
  • Last Modified: 23 July 2024
  • File format: Text
  • Words: 3,410 (approx)
  • Number of pages: 14 (approx)

Text preview of this essay:

This page of the essay has 3,410 words.



ayThe Elaine Riots

  The Elaine Massacre was one of the most destructive racial dispute that had taken place in Arkansas history and perhaps, the bloodiest racial rivalry in the history of the United States. While its inmost origin lies in the United States dedication to white superiority, the events in Elaine were emanated from strained race affiliates and expanding sympathy regarding the labor unions. A firing incident that took place at a meeting of the Progressive Farmers and the Household Union inflated into throng brutality on the part of the white people in Elaine and the nearby areas. Despite, the perfect number is unidentified, a huge number of African Americans were killed by the white’s territory that was around hundreds; and five white men lost their lives.

  The strife had taken place on the night of September 30, 1919, when nearly hundreds of African Americans, essentially peasants on the plantations of white landlords, organized a meeting for the Progressive Farmers and the Household Union of America at Hoop Spur, that was three miles north of Elaine. The motive of the meeting was that the black peasants in the Elaine area for the past few months were attaining better refund for their cotton crops from the white ranch owners who managed the area during the Jim Crow era. Black peasants were often abused, ill-treated in their attempts to collect a pension for their cotton crops.

    During the past few months, a racial dispute had taken place in abundant cities in America, counting Washington DC, Chicago, Illinois, Knoxville, Tennessee; and Indianapolis, Indiana. There was a labor dispute expanded all over the country at the end of World War I, government and business clarified the needs of labor progressively as the work of different outlooks, such as Bolshevism/socialism, that exposed the authority of the American recession. Plunging into this greatly flame had combined the return to the United States of black soldiers who often presented a less deferential perspective within the Jim Crow society around them.

    The Unions such as the Progressive Farmers represented a threat not only to the tenet of white supremacy but also to the basic perceptions of industrialism. Although, the United States was on the disarming side of World War I, followers of American commercialism initiated in communalism a new threat to their safety. With the accomplishment of the Russian Revolt, ending the binge of global socialism was seen as the obligation of all devoted Americans. Arkansas governor Charles Hillman Brough even mentioned a St. Louis, Missouri, spectators through the war that there were many American’s who survived and devoted their lives for the nation and even Wisconsin senator Robert LaFollete was called, who was divergent towards the war, and was a Bolshevik leader. The threat of socialism appeared to be universally not only in the industrial raids directed by the essential Industrial Labors of the World but as well as in the cotton fields of Arkansas.

    The Leaders of the Hoop Spur union had positioned fortified safeguards all over the church to avoid commotion to their consultation and perception congregation by the white rivals. Though interpretations of who had fired the first gunshots were in strident combat, about that, was in front of the church on the night of September 30, 1919, it was among the fortified blackguards who were surrounded by the church and the three persons whose vehicle were placed in front of the church and the outcome was the death of W. A. Adkins, who was a white security officer of the Railroad, and attacked Charles Pratt, who was the white deputy sheriff of the Phillip’s country.

     The next morning, the Phillips County officer directed out his men’s to capture those alleged of being involved in the firing. Although, the clique confronted marginal conflict from the black citizens of the area that was around Elaine, the terror of African Americans, who outstripped whites in the area of Phillips County by a proportion of around ten to one, that induced an assessed nearly five hundred to seven hundred equipped white men who belonged generally from the nearby Arkansas provinces, but even through the Mississippi river that was next to Elaine, to place down what was described by them as an insurgency. On October 1, Phillips County consultants sent three messages to Gov. Brough, demanding that the U.S. troops should be directed to Elaine. Brough responded by attaining authorization from the Constituent part of War to send more than 1000 combat certified troops from Camp Pike, that’s Little Rock of Pulaski County.

    After the white-armed forces reached Elaine in the morning of October 2, 1919, the white group of men started to proceed the area and arrived at their homes. The army positioned numerous hundred African Americans in provisional barriers until they could be interrogated and assured for by their white bosses.

    The affidavit shows that the group of whites overwhelmed African Americans in and all around Elaine. For example, H. F. Smiddy, who was one of the white spectators to the destruction, execrated in an attended account in 1921 that many whites began to chase for the Negros and firing, them as they approached towards them. The unreliable indication also recommends that the troops from Camp Pike were involved in the unobservant slaughter of African Americans in that area, which, if accurate, was a repetition of past local militia commotion that was to lay down alleged black riots. In 1925, Sharpe Dunaway, a member of the Arkansas News reporter, assumed that armed forces in Elaine had executed one slaughter after the other with all the tranquil consideration in the world, moreover too merciless to recognize the wickedness of their crimes, or as though they were too besotted on their nonsense to give a crucial mend.

    Colonel Isaac Jenks, the chief officer of the U.S. troops at Elaine, verified the number of African Americans murdered by U.S. troops were just two of them. In disparity, the journalist for the Memphis Press on October 2, 1919, wrote that there were many Negros who were described killed by the U.S troops. Another circumstantial evidence recommends that U.S. troops were also involved in mistreating the African Americans and trying to make them admit and provide evidence for who all were involved in the two white men’s murder.

  The white supremacy organization in Phillips County formed a Group of Seven that consisted of dominant plant-holders, manufacturers, and nominated administrators, to examine the origin of the conflicts. The committee had a meeting with Gov. Brough, who had proceeded on the train with the white troops and escorted them on a rally to the Hoop Spur area. The administrator described that he was going to Elaine to get the precise evidence for what had truly taken place and established the consultant of the committee in arrival for its assurance that no execution would take place in Helena that was in the Phillips County. He arrived in Little Rock the succeeding day and joined a press consultation, and was told that the situation in Elaine has steady and is in control. They thought that there no danger of assassinating, and the white residents of the country justified liberal tribute for their actions for avoiding the groups ferocity.

    Since this fact onward, there were two forms of what had happened at Elaine. The white chief placed ahead their interpretation that the black citizens were about to revolt. E. M. Allen, a worker, and land property buyer who turn out to be the presenter for Phillips County's white authority erection, and started the Helena World on October 7, that the current disorder with the Negroes in the Phillips country isn’t a race disturbance. It is was consciously deliberated insurgency of the Negroes that the contradiction for the whites was focused on an association which was known as the Liberal Farmers and the Household Union of America that was recognized for the determination of affiliating Negroes together for the assassination of white people.

    Whereas, on the other hand, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in New York, who had directed Field Administrator Walter White to examine the procedures that had taken place in Elaine, such as the disputed arguments from the onset. The White wrote in the Chicago Daily News on October 19, 1919, that the certainty there had been an insurgency that was only an invention of the thoughts of Arkansas whites and wasn’t based on the facts. It was identified that more than hundred of Negroes were killed.

    Within days of the original firing, nearly 200- 300 African Americans were taken from the provisional enclosures to the dungeon in Helena, the county base while the prison had only a few place for the prisoners. Two white associates of the Phillips Locality guys, T. K. Jones, and H. F. Smiddy specified in on oath assertions in 1921 that they executed acts of cruelty at the Phillips County prison and called others who had contributed in the afflict. On October 31, 1919, the Phillips County striking judges charged around hundreds of African Americans with misconducts restricting from the ethnic conflicts. The custody extended from massacre to night-time equine, a custody similar to extremist hostile. The judgments had begun the following week. White advocates from Helena were allotted by Trail Judge J. M. Jackson which was to symbolize the first twelve black men to go for their proceedings. Prosecutor Jacob Fink, who was selected to signify Frank Hicks, had self-confessed to the judge that he hadn’t interrogated any spectators. He ended no gesture for an alteration of the site, nor did he confront a single probable assessor, captivating the first twelve.

  By November 5, 1919, the first twelve black men were given their hearings for what they had been imprisoned for assassinating and were penalized for dying in the electric chair and some were Stifled with poisoned, and tolerating every brutality and plague at the hands of their prison officer to make them admit to a sedition to kill white people. Moreover, this was a group from the other side who strained to execute them. Throughout all that two months of dreadful conduct and absurd test, none of their own people came forward to help them until a counterfeit of the Chicago Escort, December 13th, fell into their indicators!. As a result, the remaining others promptly arrived negotiating and confirmed verdicts of up to twenty to twenty-five years for a second-degree assassination that they had enacted. Whereas, the others had their complaints discharged or finally were not indicted of their misconducts.

    In Little Rock and at the headquarters of New York, the attempt was made to instigate to fight the death verdicts that were passed down in Helena, it was led as a part by Scipio Africanus Jones, the leading black prosecutor of his time in Arkansas. Jones began to raise changes in the black society. In Little Rock for the justification of the Elaine Twelve, that came to be known as the condemned men.

    During the same period, the New York headquarters of the NAACP took the recommendation of Arkansas prosecutor U. S. Bratton, and appointed the Little Rock law firm of George C. Murphy, a prior advocate general and applicant for the administrator, as an advice for the twelve men. Murphy, a former Associated general and Arkansas advocate general, was deliberated as one of the best provisional prosecutors in Arkansas. By November, Jones had worked with Murphy and tried to save the Elaine Twelve.

    Their original mission was to request the verdicts given to the Elaine Twelve and request for an original provision based on mistakes dedicated by the provisional law court. Gov. Brough dispensed a break of the implementations to authorize a petition to the Arkansas Supreme Court after the indications were deprived of. For the next few years, the cases of the Elaine Twelve had been hindered in the lawsuit as Murphy and Jones fought to protect the black men from death. They protected new judgments for six of the men, which was known as the War offenders that were centered on the detail that the provisional justice had not prerequisite estimators to designate the point of a massacre on their consulting procedures. The persuasions of the other six men were known as the Moore offenders that were declared.

    The cases of the Elaine Twelve were petitioned on two distinct trails. The re-trials of the Ware offenders began on May 3, 1920. Throughout the prosecutions, Murphy was ill, and Jones became the main advisor. Aggression concerning him was so countless from the local white citizens that, he was terrified for his life, and was told to sleep at altered black’s house every day during the judgments. The opinions were again confirmed. Gov. Brough remained with their implementations until the Arkansas Supreme Court could again analysis the cases. Eventually, the Ware offenders were unbounded by the Arkansas Supreme Court after two positions of the court had accepted, and the state of Arkansas made no move to defend the men.

    The Moore offenders were approved for a new trial after the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Moore v. Dempsey, administrated that the unique events in Helena had been a facade, and whereas, the state of Arkansas had not delivered an accurate procedure that would have permitted the offenders to justify their legitimate right to due procedure of edict on petition.

  Instead of following a new range in federal court, in March 1923, Scipio Jones arrived into consultations to have the Moore offenders unconfined. To get themselves free, the men would have to beg for their mortified second-degree assassination and a verdict of three to five years from the date they were first imprisoned in the Arkansas State Prison. Finally, on January 14, 1925, Governor Thomas McRae well-organized the proclamation of the Moore offenders by conceding them unlimited absences after they had appealed mortification to the second-degree assassination. In the provisional, Jones had protected the proclamation of the former Elaine suspects.

    Nevertheless, some local white citizens of Phillips Province still struggled that the white people at the while represented applicable to avert a massacre in the Elaine area in 1919, the modern opinion of most historians of this calamity is that white men’s excessively killed an uncertain amount of African Americans. More provocative is the interpretation that the armed contributed in the killing of blacks. Race affairs in this area of Arkansas are presently fairly edgy for a number of details, as well as the procedures of 1919.

In the Journal of the Elaine Race Riots, I got to know the basic criticism that was for almost all the Race Riots that had taken place. However, the sophisticated social, economic and racial analysis of the Racial Riots was relatively new on the scholarly scene. It was, therefore, not surprising comparatively to work that was been undertaken. The problems the poor Negroes faced during the 1919’s. The Negroes had worked hard to raise the cotton crops but there was some trouble regarding the settlements for the cotton crops. The white landlords and the sharecroppers never went along with each other after the cotton was ready to be sold out.

  The landlords use to sell their crops the way they felt was perfect according to them. Nothing was owned by the poor black planters during the reimbursement which enumerated declarations of financial records. Nor did they own an accounting of the wages established for cotton and seeds that they grew. They were afraid of the whites. The technique of the secretarial that led to suspected exploitations of filling debt by corrupt landowners and mediators.  The articles stated that the poor Negroes were always kept in debt by their landowners. They were helpless in the stride of malicious corruption. Therefore, the Negroes have a secret meeting to discuss their scrape and gather wages for the lawyers. The reports were based on facts that the Unions literature required communal likeness and confrontation to justice.

The articles stated that the Negroes had been dispensed with discrimination. Wages was elevated in their protection, and the National Association for the Advancement of colored people fortified distinguished counsel for the judged men’s defense. After implementing, the case was approved through the magistrates of Arkansas to U.S Supreme Court and back to the Arkansas court, which released trials. There two terms that had gone without judgments and six of the men were released on June 25, 1923, whereas, the other six were approved unlimited absences by governor McRae on Jan 14, 1925. The causes stated that the effect that the Elaine Riots was not an insurrection but only a preconceived plan to put a stop to the Negro. Even asking for the statement, which ended in the slaughter of many Negroes and same whites is absolutely false.

It prompted the violence that has been part of nearly every age, counting our own. This violence could be activated by multifaceted social, financial, cultural, racial, psychological, and other factors. It was even said that behind the event of Elaine is the white and black story as well considering what interested groups of evicted whites to run riot against blacks at the beginning of the twentieth century.  

The African American Newspaper stated that six Negroes were killed in six minutes by giving the electric shock on the chair as they were found guilty of the crime they had committed by killing three white men. They were two juries that had taken place the same day and ended the same day by sentencing death to the Negroes and estimating around 122 armed forces were sent to Elaine in which five whites and more than that number of Negros were killed. It was just because the whites were shot from the trap near Hoop Spur. A white prisoner was brought and accused of the massacre that had taken place in Elaine. He was involved in killing W.A. Adkins and was detained without security.

In the Arkansas Historical Quarterly, it was stated that Mr.Carruth told Mr. Bonner that people who didn’t belong from Arkansas had no idea about the thoughtful situations challenging the people there as a result of the race riot. Mr. Carruth said that many of the Negroes were in prison while the riots were being inspected whereas the other left the country. He even said that there was unusual labor and only a few Negroes could be protected to gathered cotton crop.

They would have to get the white people from outside if they were capable of saving their crops. There was a Great War time going on and which was organized due to cotton prices, and it was a great chance for the northern factories. The black press stated that the blacks weren’t overlooked nor exploited. The cotton prices were high expectations for the postwar period.

 According to me to study The Elaine Race Riots is to study what happens on the ground, as the social, economic, racial and psychological factors that had taken place during the 1919’s in Arkansas and the other states that became centers of racial ethics in the United States history

Work Cited

1.) Wells-Barnett, Ida B. The Arkansas Race Riot. Chicago: Hume Job Print, 1920.

2.) Williams, Lee E., and Lee E. Williams. Anatomy of Four Race Riots; Racial Conflict in Knoxville, Elaine (Arkansas), Tulsa, and Chicago, 1919-1921. Hattiesburg: University and College Press of Mississippi, 1972.

3.) Whayne, Jeannie M.. 1999. “Low Villains and Wickedness in High Places: Race and Class in the Elaine Riots”. The Arkansas Historical Quarterly 58 (3). Arkansas Historical Association: 285–313. doi:10.2307/40026231.

http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.library.astate.edu/stable/40026231

4.) Butts, J. W., and Dorothy James. 1961. “The Underlying Causes of the Elaine Riot of 1919”. The Arkansas Historical Quarterly 20 (1). Arkansas Historical Association: 95–104. doi:10.2307/40025430.

http:10.2://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.library.astate.edu/stable/40025430

5.) Rogers, O. A.. 1960. “The Elaine Race Riots of 1919”. The Arkansas Historical Quarterly 19 (2). Arkansas Historical Association: 142–50. doi307/40025496.

http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.library.astate.edu/stable/40025496

6.) Elaine Blacks Shoot at Governor; Order Now Restored; Article Type: News/Opinion

Jonesboro Daily Tribune, published as JONESBORO DAILY TRIBUNE (Jonesboro, Arkansas) • 10-02-1919

http://infoweb.newsbank.com.ezproxy.library.astate.edu

7.) Taylor, Kieran. 1999. “"we Have Just Begun": Black Organizing and White Response in the Arkansas Delta, 1919”. The Arkansas Historical Quarterly 58 (3). Arkansas Historical Association: 264–84. doi:10.2307/40026229.

http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.library.astate.edu/stable/40026229

 8.) Try Six Negroes; Death Verdicts In Eight Minutes. First Two Trials for Elaine (Ark.) [Illegible]; Article Type: News/Opinion

Broad Ax, published as Broad Axe (Chicago, Illinois) • 11-08-1919

http://infoweb.newsbank.com.ezproxy.library.astate.edu/ in here…

About this essay:

If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay Sauce, Exploring the Elaine Massacre: US Race Riot and Unrest of 1919. Available from:<https://www.essaysauce.com/sample-essays/2016-5-1-1462125070/> [Accessed 18-05-26].

These Sample essays have been submitted to us by students in order to help you with your studies.

* This essay may have been previously published on EssaySauce.com and/or Essay.uk.com at an earlier date than indicated.