Home > Sample essays > US Foreign Policy & Intervention: 1954 Guatemala Coup and its Effects on the Region

Essay: US Foreign Policy & Intervention: 1954 Guatemala Coup and its Effects on the Region

Essay details and download:

  • Subject area(s): Sample essays
  • Reading time: 4 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 1 April 2019*
  • Last Modified: 23 July 2024
  • File format: Text
  • Words: 1,130 (approx)
  • Number of pages: 5 (approx)

Text preview of this essay:

This page of the essay has 1,130 words.



Underlying concepts in Political Science and International Relations includes sovereignty of each nation-state, with relations of national security. These suppositions can question and conflict with reality. A primary example of this is in Guatemala, where political power affected the United States. There are numerous individuals who believes that the effects of U.S. foreign policy and intervention attempts placed with the use of action, display the catastrophic situation in Guatemala. The 1954 coup in Guatemala had been a controversial argument since Jacobo Arbenz became president. Following the coup an operation made by the CIA, led an uprising against a communist group. They called it PBSUCCESS and it was another advantage of Soviet foreign policy. Later on, historians who were interested in the case, debated whether The United States exaggerated the threat of Communism in Guatemala.

Part 1:

It is known that the risk of intervening in an unfamiliar nation/state is contemplated to be a warning to its independence.Yet, factual historical accounts as well as United States legal documents demonstrate clear evidence that the U.S. Government was responsible for a large amoutn of propositions in Guatemala that involved 1954 coup d’état and the Civil War. The Cold war was also a major aspect in which we saw the United States partake in other world affairs. Because of the military power during the war, the United States based our political decisions around the power.The Soviet Union and The United States had differing opinions about Communism. Soviet Union supported Communism while United States made sure that they stayed away. Because of the two major powers, the issue lasted for 50 years and affected the viewpoints of the world.The two countries forced their ideologies to surrounding countries around the world, which included Guatemala.This furthered explained why the hint of Communism struck a point to United States, especially being close to home. A revolution happened because The United Fruit Company was severely losing soil and that led the CIA to intervene with a land reform that was passed by Jacobo Arbenz. The intervention led to a loss of security both socially and politically in Guatemala and made a mass of the natives decide to move to the United States.

Not so long after that, the United States believed Arbenz was a communist. The Duck test emerged to identify a communist. Immerman tells us what Ambassador Richard Patterson said to the 1950 Rotary Club . Patterson was sure that if an “unidentified bird looked like a duck, walked, swam and quacked like a duck, that it could be considered a duck, even if the bird wasn’t wearing a label which indicated that it was a duck (Immerman, p 102).” This quote was directed to resemble President Arbenz.

Part 2-

 Richard H. Immerman believed that The United States had tunnel vision toward the events in Guatemala based on the Cold War and sought out that the coup was just a successful revolution. “The larger problem was Communism. When the issue was Communism there could be no negotiation (Immerman, p 82).” When Eisenhower was President, he declared that the discovery of Communism in Guatemala was his biggest achievement. Be that as it may, as per Immerman, he didn't uncover the way that his organization assumed the conclusive part in this achievement.  He additionally expresses that neither Truman nor Eisenhower were uninterested in Latin America, just in light of the way that monetarily and deliberately, it was excessively essential. This was noteworthy in light of the fact that the United States imagined that the possibility of socialism would be effectively spread and impacted by different nations in Latin America, and obviously, that would be unfavorable to the United States if these nations had comrade belief systems. Roosevelt additionally experienced feedback for not accomplishing more to cultivate the monetary freedom of Latin America. “In Latin America we look for as a matter of first importance a methodical political and financial improvement which will make the Latin American countries impervious to the inward development of socialism and to Soviet political fighting . . . Furthermore, we look for side of the equator solidarity in support of our reality approach and the collaboration of the Latin American countries in defending the half of the globe through individual and aggregate protection measures against outer hostility and inside subversion." Immerman, Richard H. The CIA in Guatemala. As found in this quote, there was no hard confirmation that socialist existed in Latin America. They needed to stop the hypothesis of it, one which may have never at any point existed. The United States mediated too hurriedly simply in light of doubt. The Truman strategy for opposing Communist animosity was military regulation.

Part 3-

United Fruit was a state inside the Guatemalan state. It not just possessed the majority of Guatemala's banana creation and cornered banana sends out, it additionally claimed the nation's phone and broadcast framework, and the greater part of the railroad track. Notwithstanding redistributing United Fruit arrive, the legislature likewise started contending with United Fruit in the generation and fare of bananas. Critical individuals in the decision circles of the US, required with United Fruit Company, utilized their impact to persuade the US government to venture in. In 1954, Eisenhower and Dulles chose that Arbenz at long last needed to go, and the US State Department marked Guatemala "socialist". On this guise, US help and gear were given to the Guatemalan Army. The US likewise sent a CIA armed force and CIA planes. They shelled an army installation and an administration radio station, and toppled Arbenz Guzmán, who fled to Cuba.  The overthrow reestablished the stranglehold on the Guatemalan economy of both the landed tip top and US financial interests. President Eisenhower was eager to make poor people, ignorant Guatemalan laborers pay in appetite and torment for supporting area change, and for attempting to accomplish a superior future for themselves and their families. Keeping in mind the end goal to guarantee perpetually expanding benefits for an American enterprise, the US State Department, the CIA, and United Fruit Company had prevailing with regards to taking flexibility and land from Guatemala's laborers, unions from its specialists, and seek after a law based Guatemala from the greater part of its kin.  Helped by the US, Colonel Castillo Armas turned into the new president. The US Ambassador outfitted Armas with arrangements of radical rivals to be disposed of, and the phlebotomy speedily started. Under Armas, thousands were captured and many were tormented and murdered. Joined Fruit recovered all its territory. As an additional present, the Banana Worker's Union was restricted. Armas disappointed 33% of the voters by banning unskilled people from voting. He banned all political gatherings, work confederations, and worker associations. He shut down restriction daily papers and consumed "subversive" books. The "Springtime" had finished.

About this essay:

If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay Sauce, US Foreign Policy & Intervention: 1954 Guatemala Coup and its Effects on the Region. Available from:<https://www.essaysauce.com/sample-essays/2017-4-28-1493348591/> [Accessed 04-05-26].

These Sample essays have been submitted to us by students in order to help you with your studies.

* This essay may have been previously published on EssaySauce.com and/or Essay.uk.com at an earlier date than indicated.