Home > Sample essays > The Scientific Revolution: A Key Development in Western Society

Essay: The Scientific Revolution: A Key Development in Western Society

Essay details and download:

  • Subject area(s): Sample essays
  • Reading time: 6 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 1 January 1970*
  • Last Modified: 23 July 2024
  • File format: Text
  • Words: 1,848 (approx)
  • Number of pages: 8 (approx)

Text preview of this essay:

This page of the essay has 1,848 words.



Paste your essay in here…THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION

(Weltanschauung: A comprehensive conception or apprehension of the world especially for a specific standpoint – from the German Welt = World and Anschauung = View)

The scientific revolution of the seventeenth century was the major cause of the change in worldview and one of the key developments in the evolution of Western society.

Although it owes much to ancient Greek and medieval Arabic knowledge only the West developed modern science; historians disagree as to how important its rise were the non scientific economic, religious, and social factors

Causes of the Scientific Revolution

The scientific revolution was the product of individual genius-such as Newton building on the works of Copernicus and others

Also, medieval universities provided the framework for the new science

The navigational problems of sea voyages generated scientific research and new instruments

Better ways of obtaining knowledge about the world improved scientific methods

Bacon advocated empirical, experimental research

Descartes stressed mathematics and deductive reasoning

The modern scientific method is based on a synthesis of Bacon’s inductive experimentalism and Descartes’s deductive mathematical rationalism

Scientific thought in the early 1500s

European ideas about the universe were based on Aristotelian medieval ideas

Central to this view was the belief in a motionless earth fixed at the centre of the universe

Around the earth moved ten crystal spheres, and beyond the spheres was heaven

Aristotle’s scheme suited Christianity because it positioned human beings at the centre of the universe and established a home for God

Science in this period was primarily a branch of theology

Astronomy and Physics

The trial of Galileo evidenced the widening rift between science and the church

From the mid 16th century to the beginning of the 18th century, a scientific revolution took place that changed how Europeans thought of themselves and of the world and universe around them, fundamentally changing history

Science wasn’t new to the 16th century, what was new was the methods scientists engaged in and the questions scientists asked

Scientists of the Middle Ages sought answers which would fit into their preconceived notions about the universe and the world

For instance, it was assumed that planetary orbits were a perfect circle because of God’s will, and stubbornly held to the belief that the Earth was the centre of the Universe

This way of thinking held scientific progress in check, as Scientists did not look for new answers, they attempted to confirm old ones

As the Renaissance brought a new age to art and religion through classicism and humanism, new scientific methods would revolutionize science, as scientists started to use experimentation to develop new theories

Nicolaus Copernicus

Copernicus, a Polish clergyman and astronomer, claimed that the earth revolved around the sun and that the sun was the centre of the universe

Drawing inspiration from Aristarchus of Samos (a third century Greek philosopher), Copernicus developed a heliocentric model of the universe in On the Revolution of Celestial Spheres, where he held that all planets orbited the sun instead of the earth

This heliocentric theory was a departure from medieval thought and created doubts about traditional Christianity

Copernicus also suggested that the earth rotated on its axis every 24 hours and that the Moon orbited the earth

While his ideas were brilliant and novel, he was in many ways a conservative thinker whose conclusions were based more on philosophy than science

Galileo Galilei

Galileo was a Florentine astronomer who attempted to prove Copernicus’ beliefs through scientific and mathematical experiments

For instance, he rolled balls down slopes and measured their velocity, and in doing so proved the idea of inertia (that objects in motion tend to stay in motion and objects at rest tend to stay at rest)

Galileo discovered through a handmade telescope that the moon was not smooth, but had craters and mountains, he discovered that the sun had spots, and discovered that Jupiter had moons; these discoveries enhanced his belief in Copernican’ beliefs

Said “in discussion of physical problems we ought to begin not from the authority of scriptural passages, but from sense-experiences and necessary observations”

In Galileo’s Dialogue on the Two Chief Systems of the World, he openly supported Copernican notions, and described the opponents of it (like the Jesuits) as simple-minded; the ensuing public support for his ideas led to a battle of forward thinking against the conservative beliefs of the Church

Galileo discovered the laws of motion using the experimental method – the cornerstone

He also applied the experimental method to astronomy, using the newly invented telescope

Galileo was tried by the Inquisition for Heresy in 1633 and forced to recant his views

Tycho Brahe

Brahe was a Danish aristocrat who made thousands of observations on planets and stars, for instance disproving Aristotle’s belief that stars are fixed and unalterable; however, he did not agree with Copernicus in a heliocentric universe

Brahe set the stage for the modern study of astronomy by building an observatory and collecting data

Johannes Kepler

It required the brilliance of Kepler and Isaac Newton to build on the work of Copernicus and Galileo to further our understanding of the universe

Kepler had once been Brahe’s assistant and was a contemporary of Galileo

He was convinced that Copernicus was right, and set about formulating mathematical laws which governed the solar system through planetary observation

He developed 3 laws of planetary motion

1: Planets move in elliptical orbits with the Sun as the centre, disproving Galileo’s belief of circular orbits

2: As a planet moves closer to the sun, it moves more quickly, as it moves further from the sun, it moves slower. Disproved idea that heavenly motion is constant

3: Size of a planet's orbit is proportional to the time it takes to orbit the sun. He proved that “the square of the ratio of the time it takes any two planets to complete their orbit equals the cube of the ratio of these planet’s average distance from the sun”

Isaac Newton

Isaac Newton – English scientist, provided great synthesis that would draw together the discoveries made during the preceding century.

Used concepts of Copernicus, Galileo, and Kepler

Formulated three laws of motion

If no force acts on an object, it will remain at rest or maintain its constant motion in a straight line

Every change of motion or acceleration of a body is directly proportional to the force that caused the change and inversely proportional to the object’s mass

For every action force, there is an equal reaction force in the opposite direction

Work began in Poland – Copernicus, continued in Italy – Galileo, and Germany – Kepler, and finished by Newton in England

THE REVOLUTION IN ANATOMY

William Harvey

Unlike predecessor, Vesalius, Harvey (English physician), not satisfied with divine power as explanation of workings of the heart

Published On the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals in 1628 – book about heart

Harvey described the heart as a pump rather than a filtration plant (traditionally described as filter)

Harvey discovered in 1 hour, heart pumps more than a person’s mass in blood – means that the veins would burst if blood were not somehow circulating

Believed in circular blood flow – heart -> arteries -> veins -> heart…

His work opened up whole new set of questions and problems regarding blood and human anatomy

SCIENTIFIC METHOD AND THE BIRTH OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY

Scientific Method

The underpinning of the scientific revolution was a new approach to determine truth

Centuries – people believed that you arrived at truth by relying on long-trusted authorities such as the bible or classical scholars

Two key figures in outlining new scientific methods were Francis Bacon and Rene Descartes

Francis Bacon

Francis Bacon was a product of the English renaissance

Well versed in politics, literature and philosophy, he earned a lasting reputation for work in science

Rejected deductive methods of middle ages – stressed importance of direct observation in ascertaining truth

Wrote book called Novum Organum, published in 1620 to replace Aristotle’s Organon

Aristotle’s Organon is a collection of his six major works on logic

Book proposed a method of inquiry still used in scientific study today

Believed that knowledge is a basis for power and allows humans to control nature

René Descartes

René Descartes laid the foundations for modern philosophy, though he remained a devout Catholic throughout his life

His greatest contribution to the intellectual revolution of the seventeenth century was his application of methods and reasoning used in mathematics to the field of philosophy

René Descartes did not believe that you can rely solely on your senses in the search for truth – unlike Bacon

Maintained that all things can be doubted

Senses can be deceived and information can be false

Proof of our existence comes from the fact that we think

Descartes said: “I think, therefore I am”

All other truths are based on mental perceptions

The thinking of Descartes led to a conception of the universe as purely mechanical and physical  

He was able to rationalize God’s existence only through reason because God cannot physically be experienced

Questioning Political Legitimacy Hobbes vs locke

Reformation challenged authority of papacy and roman catholic church

Sci revolution challenged long term beliefs on universe, basis of knowledge

Claiming to govern by divine right losing credibility as traditional values challenged

Hobbes and locke wrote discourse beginning with imagining life in the state of nature, before diverging dramatically

Thomas Hobbes

Witnessed conflict of English revolution of 1640’s; political policy shaped by chaos following execution of king Charles I

In book Leviathan hobbes explains justification for any govt

Described humans as selfish aggressive left to own resources would be in constant state of chaos.

In “state of nature,” humans are free, but also had to fend for themselves against dangers

Believed that only the establishment of an absolute sovereign could bring peace out chaos

John Locke

Locke agreed with Hobbes that humans came from nature, as in “state of nature”

However, he believed that they came together to form societies and were capable of that without a King.

He believed in a social contract, that people gave up some rights in exchange for a the benefits of a society.

Locke believed that government came from giving up those rights, but there were some rights that were protected, unalienable ones like Life, Liberty and Property

Accordingly, he believed that power came from the people and should stay with them, leading to a belief that the people can remove a bad government and the people’s rights come first.

He also believed that the people should revolt if the government tried to repress those rights, since he believed in the primacy of the people.

Locke and Hobbes influenced later constitutions.

US Constitution influenced by Locke’s inalienable rights

BNA influenced by Hobbes’s belief that the government exists to regulate behavior.

US Constitution was Locke-like, as it guaranteed rights.

Along with the scientific revolution, there was a revolution in the views of monarchy.

Absolutism (Russia, Spain and France) was challenged by Constitutionalism, the idea that the government should be checked by an elected parliament.  

That conflict led to open war and regicide in England

About this essay:

If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay Sauce, The Scientific Revolution: A Key Development in Western Society. Available from:<https://www.essaysauce.com/sample-essays/2018-6-8-1528469294/> [Accessed 21-04-26].

These Sample essays have been submitted to us by students in order to help you with your studies.

* This essay may have been previously published on EssaySauce.com and/or Essay.uk.com at an earlier date than indicated.