Parliamentary supremacy (Malaysia)

Introduction It is a fundamental principle of democratic government that there should be an elected assembly representing the people, and that this assembly should have authority to make laws that apply to the entire population. But there is no universal agreement that such an assembly should have an absolute and unlimited power to make laws … Read more

Delegated Legislation

Delegated legislation is where a specific element of an existing Act of Parliament can be amended by particular parties such as; Government Ministers, local authorities and the Queen and Privy Council. These parties are granted power to make changes to current laws through enabling/parent Acts. The enabling/parent Acts sets out the parameters of which the … Read more

Beveridge’s influence on social policy

Social policy affects the everyday life of every British citizen through their lifetime, it’s determined by the government, and is made up of measures and interventions that are implemented in relation to the needs of society. The definition of what the needs of society are vary. Social policy aims to address the problems society faces … Read more

Namibia’s legal obligations – Sustainable Fishing

Chapter 1 Orientation of Study 1.1 Introduction Sustainable development is one of the prominent topics within the halls of International Environmental Law. The concept has become one of the principles of international law, influencing, guiding and architecting many State aspects that are close to social and economic development. Sustainable development is most commonly defined as … Read more

Is the Euro a failed experiment?

On February 7th, 1992, the Maastricht Treaty wаs signed by the members of the European Community in Maastricht, The Netherlands. The Maastricht Treaty created the European Union and soon led it to having a single European currency, the EURO. This was the beginning of a new era for the European Union as we know it … Read more

Should the use of medical cannabis be legalised in South Australia?

The legalisation of marijuana is one of the most discussed and controversial topics in Australia. Throughout the years, each individual developed their own opinion towards the matter, developing a strong debate caused by the contrasting views as to why it should be legalised or not. Many say that it has numerous medical benefits, therefore it … Read more

Parliamentary sovereignty

Parliamentary sovereignty is the principle in the constitution of the United Kingdom. The Queen use to be the main legislative authority in the past. She was able to pass down any law, this was known as the Queen in Parliament. Royal Prerogatives is a form of historical powers, which is used by the Monarch, but … Read more

Hierarchy of the Courts

A major belief in the doctrine of judicial precedent lays, is that there needs to be a hierarchy of the courts in order to operate. The whole idea of Stare Decisis, meaning to stick with what has been concluded this makes the basis of the doctrine of judicial precedent. The point of this is that … Read more

Separation of powers

Montesquieu and L´Esprit des lois The idea of seperated powers has an old background. Philosophers as Aristoteles and John Locke have already been debating about this theme. Locke stated that there is the need of a principle concerned with the efficiency of government and avoidance of tyranny. This last point was also established by the … Read more

CIPD Human Resources Profession Map (HRPM)

1. The CIPD Human Resources Profession Map (HRPM) which has been designed to set the highest standards of professional competencies in HR. (as shown in the image below). It has been developed after using much research including detailed interviews with HR directors across the board as well as many HR professionals. This tool serves the … Read more

The exclusionary rule

Recent decisions in the Supreme Court would undoubtedly show judicial discomfort with the operation of the exclusionary rule in Irish Law. Since the seminal decision of People (AG) V O’Brien in the supreme court, the exclusionary rule has dominated cases questioning the admissibility of evidence. For a long time following the subsequent ruling in Kenny … Read more

Case Dano

Case Dano concerns a legal dispute between Elisabeta and Florin Dano and Jobcenter Leipzig. The Romanian Ms Dano entered Germany with her son, asked for social benefits, but does not look for a job while the assistance is only meant for jobseekers. Ms Dano was granted a residence permit from the German authorities and is … Read more

Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007

Since the enactment of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (hereafter 2007 Act), there have been a number of prosecution cases for work related manslaughter in the United Kingdom. However, very few of these have in fact materialized. This is due to the limitations and obscurities apparent in the present law. It is … Read more

Majority rule

Executive Summary “Majority rule” is an integral principle of company law: ‘those who take interests in companies limited by shares have to accept majority rule’ (per Lord Wilberforce, Re Kong Thai Sawmill [1978] 2 MLJ 277). Yet there are exceptions to this, in the various remedies open to minority shareholders for when they, or the … Read more

Law personal statement

I have always had a deep interest in the legal framework of rules that mould the modern world. The way in which legal emphasis shifts to adapt to Britain’s diverging pluralistic society is the most intriguing development in modern law. Extremely challenging issues are becoming ever-present and soon the law will be forced to challenge … Read more