Bazarov is a true nihilist, he doesn’t believe in authority, nor does he believe in showing affection, and has the true nihilist belief that everything must be torn down and everything must be condemned. Nothing can be believed and not the word of anyone should be believed except for scientific fact of what can be proven.
After Arkady graduates they both arrive at Arkady’s home. We meet Arkady’s father, Nikolai Petrovich Kirsanov and uncle Pavel Petrovich Kirsanov, both are conservatives in the aristocratic class. Nikolai being romantic as well. I also think Pavel could also be a bit of a materialist, he seems to always wear fragrances and is always dressed nicely. He and Nikolai have an argument after some time with Bazarov. Pavel cannot bring himself to accept this nihilism and begins to despise Bazarov. The argument breaks out as Pavel can’t keep quiet any longer. Arkady hears the argument and steps in to side with Bazarov, Bazarov being the one arguing more fiercely in the belief of the nihilist view. During the argument Pavel says, “You’re condemning everything or, to be more precise, you’re pulling everything down, but surely you’ve got to build something as well.” (50) Bazarov replies with “That’ s not for us to do. First we’ve got to clear the ground.” (50) Arkady buts in “The contemporary state of the peasantry demands this, we must fulfil these needs, we don’t have the right to give in to satisfying our personal egoism.” (50) The book says that Bazarov is “displeased” of what Arkady added, being that his addition “smacked of philosophizing” which he relates to romanticism. (50) Here I think is when we see that Arkady isn’t truly involved in being a nihilist, only trying to follow his friend and mentor. A short time after the argument had taken place, Nikolai is in the garden. He is thinking to himself and reflecting, recalling how his brother Pavel had said their ideology was in the right. He seems to be having trouble with the nihilist ideology and how someone could “reject poetry” and “have no sympathy for art and nature.”(57)
Sometime after the argument Arkady and Bazarov head into town to take up on the invitation of Arkady’s relative to visit. There they meet Viktor Somich Sitnikov who we learn is a liberal. They also meet Avdotya Nikitishna Kukshina is a feminist that lives in a nearby home near where they’re staying in the town. Lengthy conversation takes place in the home of Kukshina. Kukshina is very talkative, her stance on women’s rights and feminism is shown. During a conversation Sitnikov says “Are you standing up for all these silly women?” (70)
Kukshina responds “Not for silly women, no, but for the rights of women, which I’ve vowed to defend to the last drop of my blood.” (70)
After this conversation, they head to the governor’s ball. Where they meet Anna Sergeevna Odintsova. During the ball Arkady is interested in her, but it seems she looks down on him. Bazarov doesn’t join in the conversation and sits by himself. They are invited to her house, so they join her. We learn that Anna Sergeevna has been married before but is widowed. She married for money and was left with everything she could ever need or want. I think Anna is our biggest representation of materialism. She does indeed have anything and everything she could want. She keeps order about how things are ran, otherwise she would become bored. She is also another example of liberalism, she shares in the ideas of progressives.
...(download the rest of the essay above)
About this essay:
This essay was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.
If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:
Essay Sauce, Fathers and Sons (1862 novel). Available from:<https://www.essaysauce.com/literature-essays/fathers-and-sons-1862-novel/> [Accessed 14-10-19].
Review this essay:
Please note that the above text is only a preview of this essay.